April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Implementation of a New Questionnaire Into Recently Revised Japanese Dry Eye Diagnostic Criteria
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. Uchino
    Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • M. Dogru
    Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Y. Uchino
    Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • S. Ward
    Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • T. Wakamatsu
    Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • K. Tsubota
    Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M. Uchino, None; M. Dogru, None; Y. Uchino, None; S. Ward, None; T. Wakamatsu, None; K. Tsubota, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 4669. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. Uchino, M. Dogru, Y. Uchino, S. Ward, T. Wakamatsu, K. Tsubota; Implementation of a New Questionnaire Into Recently Revised Japanese Dry Eye Diagnostic Criteria. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):4669.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the implementation of a new symptom questionnaire (OSDI modified into Japanese) into the revised Japan Dry Eye Diagnostic Criteria and to investigate the changes in the dry eye diagnosis.

Methods: : 239 Subjects (75 males, 164 females, average age 39.7 years) who were seen for general and dry eye examination, filled out a questionnaire (modified OSDI) with questions pertaining to alternations in visual function, ocular symptoms, and environmental triggers often associated with dry eye disease. A dry eye severity score (DESS) was given based on the numbers of questions and the total scores. From the results of Schirmer I test (ST), tear break up time (BUT), and fluorescein (F) and Rose Bengal (RB) staining, patients were diagnosed with Definite Dry Eye (DDE), Probable Dry Eye (PDE), or Not Dry Eye (nonDE), using both the old and revised diagnostic criteria.

Results: : All 44 subjects diagnosed as non DE under the old criteria were diagnosed as nonDE under the new diagnostic criteria. Fifty seven subjects diagnosed as PDE under the old criteria were diagnosed as nonDE (18 subjects) and PDE (39 subjects) in new diagnostic criteria. Under the old criteria, 138 were diagnosed as DDE, however, under the new criteria 58 subjects were diagnosed as PDE and the remains 80 were diagnosed as DDE.The average DESS score under the new diagnostic criteria was 29.8 in nonDE, 33.2 in PDE, and 41.2 in DDE.

Conclusions: : The DESS obtained from new symptom questionnaire was found to correspond well to the revised dry eye diagnosis. The new diagnosis criteria is expected to separate the severe dry eye patients from the moderate dry eye patients.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: risk factor assessment • cornea: tears/tear film/dry eye • lacrimal gland 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×