April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Proportion of Diabetic Retinopathy Found in Rural and Urban Populations of American Indian/Alaska Natives and Other Ethnicities Using Either a Telemedicine Protocol or Traditional Surveillance Techniques
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • T. M. McClure
    Devers Eye Institute, Legacy Health System, Portland, Oregon
  • I. Swanson
    Devers Eye Institute, Legacy Health System, Portland, Oregon
  • K. Wooten
    Hunter Health Clinic, Wichita, Kansas
  • T. M. Becker
    Department of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
  • S. L. Mansberger
    Devers Eye Institute, Legacy Health System, Portland, Oregon
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  T.M. McClure, None; I. Swanson, None; K. Wooten, None; T.M. Becker, None; S.L. Mansberger, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  IU43 DP00002401 (SLM), 5K23EY015501-01 (SLM), American Glaucoma Society
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 4421. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      T. M. McClure, I. Swanson, K. Wooten, T. M. Becker, S. L. Mansberger; Proportion of Diabetic Retinopathy Found in Rural and Urban Populations of American Indian/Alaska Natives and Other Ethnicities Using Either a Telemedicine Protocol or Traditional Surveillance Techniques. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):4421.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To determine the proportion of diabetic retinopathy (DR) found in underserved rural and urban populations of American Indian/Alaska Natives (AI/AN) and other ethnicities using non-mydriatic retinal imaging and traditional surveillance techniques.

Methods: : We performed a staged survival design by randomly assigning participants to one of two groups: Camera or Provider, and asked both groups to see an Eye Care Provider (ECP) annually. We also took retinal images of Camera group participants at least once per year, while Provider group participants received imaging only in the 3rd and 4th years of the study. We evaluated retinal images for DR and other ocular disease, and sent electronic reports to the sites for inclusion in patient charts; ECP evaluations were performed using traditional surveillance methods by local ECP’s. We used a predetermined scale of DR type, ranging from Stages 1 (Mild NPDR) to 5 (PDR), for all image and ECP evaluations.

Results: : We present data for 532 participants who have completed at least 1 year of the study [268 (50%) in the Camera group; 264 (50%) in the Provider group]. 243 (90.7%) Camera group participants had images evaluated, with 13 (4.9%) having images that were too dark or otherwise unreviewable; 53 (19.8%) of them also had an ECP exam. 69 (26.1%) of Provider group participants had an ECP exam. Based on image evaluations in the more damaged eye in the Camera group, we found 31 (11.6%) had Mild NPDR; 7 (2.6%) were Moderate; and 3 (1.1%) had PDR. In this group, ECP evaluations found 6 (2.2%) with Mild NPDR; 5 (1.9%) with Moderate; and 2 (0.7%) with PDR [Undetermined=1 (0.4%)]. In the Provider group, ECP evaluations found 11 (4.2%) with Mild NPDR; 8 (3%) with Moderate; 2 (0.8%) with Severe; and 2 (0.8%) with PDR [Undetermined=3 (1.1%)].

Conclusions: : Retinal imaging using a non-mydriatic camera increases the proportion of diabetics who obtain screening eye exams. Most diabetics in this sample did not have levels of diabetic retinopathy that required ophthalmic intervention.

Keywords: diabetic retinopathy • diabetes • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×