April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Evaluation of Poly (Sodium Methacrylate) Materials as Potential Vitreous and Lens Substitutes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • N. Ravi
    Executive Branch,
    VA Medical Center, St Louis, Missouri
    Ophthalmology, Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
  • P. D. Hamilton
    Research,
    VA Medical Center, St Louis, Missouri
  • M. A. Reilly
    Executive Branch,
    VA Medical Center, St Louis, Missouri
    Ophthalmology, Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  N. Ravi, None; P.D. Hamilton, None; M.A. Reilly, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  VA Rehab Merit Review Grant to N. Ravi, Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., NIH Core Grant (P30 EY 02687), Washington University
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 4448. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      N. Ravi, P. D. Hamilton, M. A. Reilly; Evaluation of Poly (Sodium Methacrylate) Materials as Potential Vitreous and Lens Substitutes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):4448.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : We are continuing our search for developing polymeric hydrogels that form in situ as potential vitreous substitutes and lens nanocomposites. With this goal in mind, in this study we synthesized and characterize anionic poly(sodium methacrylate) based materials with respect to number average molecular weight (MWn), refractive index (RI), polydispersity (PD), storage and elastic modulus and transparency.

Methods: : Poly(methacrylic acid) based hydrogels were synthesized in N,N-dimethylformamide, as described by Gao et al., PMSE 2007, 97,572. 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylamide was incorporated to allow for subsequent hydrophobic modification of the copolymer. Reversible hydrogels were prepared by incorporation of bis-methacryloyl cystamine crosslinker at 2 and 5%. Polymers were characterized using a Viscotek multi-detection system in conjunction with GPC. Polymers were neutralized with NaOH and placed in phosphate buffered saline. Storage and elastic modulus was determined using a Vilastic-3 oscillatory capillary tube rheometer. RI was obtained from an Abbe Refractometer.

Results: : Measured parameters are displayed in Table 1. Values are given for 1.5%w/w formulations for all polymers. Storage and loss modulus values were measured at 10% shear strain and a frequency of 2Hz.

Conclusions: : This is our first analysis of poly (sodium methacrylate). Advantageous features of this polymer includes: 1) it has high viscosity at low concentrations; 2) poly(sodium methacrylate) is relatively biocompatible; 3) it has adhesive properties; 4) it mimics biological proteins and polysaccharides, which have ionic components. Transparency issues with certain combinations may require the use of poly(sodium methacrylate) as a copolymer with methacrylamides, and reduction in the amount of the hydrophobic moieties.

Keywords: vitreous substitutes • retinal adhesion • intraocular lens 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×