April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
40-Weeks Follow-Up Comparative Pilot Study of VEGF-Inhibitors Intravitreal Therapy for Macular Edema in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusions
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • E. Frances-Munoz
    Ophthalmology,
    University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
  • R. Gallego-Pinazo
    Ophthalmology,
    University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
  • M. Díaz-Llopis
    Ophthalmology,
    University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
    University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Spain
  • M. J. Gómez-Maestra
    Ophthalmology,
    University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
  • S. García-Delpech
    Ophthalmology,
    University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
  • A. Vázquez-Polo
    Pharmacology,
    University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  E. Frances-Munoz, None; R. Gallego-Pinazo, None; M. Díaz-Llopis, None; M.J. Gómez-Maestra, None; S. García-Delpech, None; A. Vázquez-Polo, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 5403. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      E. Frances-Munoz, R. Gallego-Pinazo, M. Díaz-Llopis, M. J. Gómez-Maestra, S. García-Delpech, A. Vázquez-Polo; 40-Weeks Follow-Up Comparative Pilot Study of VEGF-Inhibitors Intravitreal Therapy for Macular Edema in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusions. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):5403.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the efficacy of Pegaptanib and Ranibizumab as single initial therapy to improve visual acuity and macular thickness in macular edema (ME) due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Methods: : Twenty-four patients with BRVO and ME higher than 400 microns were initially randomly treated with an intravitreal injection of Pegaptanib or Ranibizumab. Further retreatments were developed in case of macular thickness higher than 300 microns. No other therapy was associated during the 40-weeks follow-up.

Results: : In the Pegaptanib Group (n=12) the initial logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0,617 +/- 0,17 and the final BCVA was 0,375 +/- 0,20 (p=0,02); in the Ranibizumab group (n=12) the initial BCVA was 0,708 +/- 0,22 and the final BCVA was 0,308 +/- 0,20 (p=0,002). No statistically significant differences were found in visual improvement between both groups (p=0,59). ME improved in the Pegaptanib group from 485,75 +/- 67,1 microns to 282,17 +/- 48,9 (p=0,002); in the Ranibizumab group improved from 505,1 + 82,1 microns to 280,7 + 33,1 (p=0,002). No statistically significant differences were found in macular thickness improvement between both groups (p=0,875). In the Pegaptanib treatment the mean number of injections to achieve macular thickness lower than 300 microns was 3,33 + 1,07; in the Ranibizumab treatment it was 3,16 + 0,83 (p=0,669).

Conclusions: : Both Pegaptanib and Ranibizumab are effective as single initial therapy of ME due to BRVO

Keywords: macula/fovea • vascular occlusion/vascular occlusive disease • vascular endothelial growth factor 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×