April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Evaluation of Physiological Changes, Comfort and Clinical Performance of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses at Two Weeks and Four Weeks
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D. Tilia
    International Clinical Trials Centre, Institute for Eye Research, Sydney, Australia
  • R. Weng
    International Clinical Trials Centre, Institute for Eye Research, Sydney, Australia
  • V. Evans
    International Clinical Trials Centre, Institute for Eye Research, Sydney, Australia
  • T. Naduvilath
    International Clinical Trials Centre, Institute for Eye Research, Sydney, Australia
  • B. Holden
    International Clinical Trials Centre, Institute for Eye Research, Sydney, Australia
    School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D. Tilia, CIBA VISION, F; R. Weng, CIBA VISION, F; V. Evans, CIBA VISION, F; T. Naduvilath, CIBA VISION, F; B. Holden, CIBA VISION, F.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 5630. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D. Tilia, R. Weng, V. Evans, T. Naduvilath, B. Holden; Evaluation of Physiological Changes, Comfort and Clinical Performance of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses at Two Weeks and Four Weeks. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):5630.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To assess if the comfort and clinical performance of silicone hydrogel lenses used in conjunction with a hydrogen peroxide based system is worse when lenses were worn for four weeks compared to two weeks.

Methods: : Ninety nine participants were randomised to wear either lotrafilcon B+copolymer 845 contact lenses or comfilcon A bilaterally for four weeks of daily wear . Both groups used hydrogen peroxide (ClearCare: CIBA VISION) as their lens care product. Participants were seen a total of three times in this study: Baseline, two weeks and four weeks.Both participant and practitioner were masked to the identity of the lens type.Clinical variables (physiological and lens characteristics) and subjective ratings (comfort and lens handling) were collected at all scheduled visits. Participants who attended both visits were included in this analysis. Mixed linear models were used for statistical analysis.

Results: : There were no significant differences with any clinical variable at four weeks compared to two weeks.Equivalence at the 95% confidence level was demonstrated with clinical variables at four weeks compared to two weeks when clinical significance was set at a difference of ≥ 0.3 grade units on a scale of 0 to 4. Dryness at the end of the day was rated significantly better at four weeks (7.5±1.9, 7.3±2.0, p=0.043) compared to two weeks. There were no significant differences for any other subjective rating or visual acuity at four weeks compared to two weeks. Equivalence at the 95% confidence level was demonstrated with subjective ratings at four weeks compared to two weeks when clinical significance was set at a difference of ≥ 0.5 grade units on a scale of 1 to 10 with the exception of dryness at the end of the day (lower 95% confidence interval = 0.52) indicating improvement at 4 weeks.

Conclusions: : These results indicate that comfort and clinical performance of these contact lenses are similar at four weeks compared to two weeks of lens wear.

Clinical Trial: : www.anzctr.org.au 12608000329369

Keywords: contact lens 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×