April 2009
Volume 50, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2009
Pupil Center Location Uncertainty Is a Major Source of Instrument Noise in WFE Measurements
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R. A. Applegate
    Visual Optics Inst/Coll of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
  • D. E. Koenig
    Visual Optics Inst/Coll of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
  • J. D. Marsack
    Visual Optics Inst/Coll of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
  • E. J. Sarver
    Sarver and Associates, Inc, Carbondale, Illinois
  • L. C. Nguyen
    Visual Optics Inst/Coll of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  R.A. Applegate, None; D.E. Koenig, None; J.D. Marsack, None; E.J. Sarver, None; L.C. Nguyen, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  R01 EY08520 (RAA), R44 EY015008 (EJS), T32 EY007024 (DEK), and P30 EY07551 (UHCO)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2009, Vol.50, 6160. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R. A. Applegate, D. E. Koenig, J. D. Marsack, E. J. Sarver, L. C. Nguyen; Pupil Center Location Uncertainty Is a Major Source of Instrument Noise in WFE Measurements. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(13):6160.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To examine the impact of pupil center location uncertainty in Shack/Hartmann (S/H) wavefront sensing on the variance in repeated measures of the high order RMS wavefront error (HO WFE).

Methods: : Dilated WFE for five eyes of five subjects representing a large range of HO WFEs (HO WFE over a 6 mm pupil ranging from 0.26 to 1.57µm) were measured using a custom wavefront sensor (lenslet spacing 400µm). Twelve measurements for each subject were averaged to form the best estimate of the WFE. The impact of the uncertainty in pupil center location on WFE quantification was modeled on the assumption that the pupil center of a 6mm diameter pupil can vary randomly by up to 200 µm in any direction. 1000 new pupil centers were sampled for each subject and used to calculate the amount of variance in the actual eye measurements attributable to uncertainty in the pupil center location.

Results: : The percentage of variance accounted for by pupil location uncertainty for each individual results from a complex interaction between magnitude and distribution of the HO-WFE and the magnitude of pupil centering error. Uncertainty in the pupil center location accounts for 31, 15, 37, 53 and 61% of the variance in the repeated measurement of the HO RMS WFE for each of the five subjects, respectively.

Conclusions: : Uncertainty in the pupil center location accounts for a significant amount of the variance in repeated wavefront measurements. Methods to minimize measurement noise due to pupil center location uncertainty include: increasing the sampling density of the lenslet array, increasing the sophistication of pupil center finding algorithms, and/or a utilization of a separate pupil camera.

Keywords: aberrations • optical properties • refractive surgery 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×