April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Control of Intraocular Pressure and Intraocular Pressure Fluctuation With Fixed Combination Brimonidine-Timolol versus Brimonidine or Timolol Monotherapy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • G. L. Spaeth
    Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • J. Caprioli
    UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
  • P. Bernstein
    Allergan Inc., Irvine, California
  • R. Schiffman
    Allergan Inc., Irvine, California
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  G.L. Spaeth, Allergan, Pfizer, law firm patents, C; Pfizer, Disability Research, R; J. Caprioli, Pfizer, F; Allergan, Pfizer, Alcon, C; Alllergan, Pfizer, Merck, Alcon, R; P. Bernstein, Allergan, E; R. Schiffman, Allergan, E.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Allergan, Inc.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 171. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      G. L. Spaeth, J. Caprioli, P. Bernstein, R. Schiffman; Control of Intraocular Pressure and Intraocular Pressure Fluctuation With Fixed Combination Brimonidine-Timolol versus Brimonidine or Timolol Monotherapy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):171.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Recent evidence suggests that reducing both intraocular pressure (IOP) and its fluctuation may be important for preventing visual field loss in glaucoma. Control of long-term IOP fluctuation may be particularly important in patients with well-controlled IOP. The purpose of the current analysis was to evaluate control of IOP fluctuation and mean IOP in glaucoma and ocular hypertension patients treated with fixed-combination brimonidine-timolol compared with brimonidine or timolol alone.

Methods: : This was a post-hoc analysis of data from 2 identical, 12-month, randomized, double-masked, multicenter trials. Patients were treated with fixed-combination brimonidine-timolol BID (n = 385), brimonidine tartrate 0.2% TID (n = 382), or timolol 0.5% BID (n = 392). IOP was measured at 8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, and 5 PM (baseline, weeks 2 and 6, and months 3, 6, 12) or at 8 AM and 10 AM (month 9). IOP fluctuation was defined as the standard deviation of IOP measurements.

Results: : The percentage of patients with mean diurnal IOP < 18 mm Hg and short-term (daily) IOP fluctuation ≤ 2 mm Hg was significantly greater in the brimonidine-timolol group than in the brimonidine or timolol group at each follow-up visit (P ≤ .044). At each hour (8 AM, 10 AM, 3 PM, and 5 PM), the percentage of patients with mean IOP < 18 mm Hg and long-term (intervisit) IOP fluctuation ≤ 2 mm Hg was significantly greater with brimonidine-timolol than with brimonidine or timolol alone (P ≤ .006).

Conclusions: : Patients treated with fixed-combination brimonidine-timolol were significantly more likely than patients treated with either brimonidine or timolol to achieve a combination of low mean IOP and low short-term (daily) or long-term (intervisit) IOP fluctuation. Fixed-combination brimonidine-timolol therapy may minimize the risk of visual field progression compared with either brimonidine or timolol alone by providing both low IOP and low fluctuation in IOP.

Clinical Trial: : www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00652106

Keywords: intraocular pressure 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×