April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Impact of Attributing Cause of Abnormality to POAG on Endpoint Rate and Statistical Power in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. O. Gordon
    Ophthal & Vis Sciences, Washington Univ Sch of Med, St Louis, Missouri
  • D. K. Heuer
    Ophthalmology, Eye Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • E. J. Higginbotham
    Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
  • R. K. Parrish, II
    Ophthal & Vis Sciences, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
  • P. A. Morris
    Ophthal & Vis Sciences, Washington Univ Sch of Med, St Louis, Missouri
  • D. A. Dunn
    Ophthal & Vis Sciences, Washington Univ Sch of Med, St Louis, Missouri
  • B. S. Wilson
    Ophthal & Vis Sciences, Washington Univ Sch of Med, St Louis, Missouri
  • M. A. Kass
    Ophthal & Vis Sciences, Washington Univ Sch of Med, St Louis, Missouri
  • The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study
    Ophthal & Vis Sciences, Washington Univ Sch of Med, St Louis, Missouri
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.O. Gordon, None; D.K. Heuer, Alcon Laboratories, C; Allergan Therapeutics, C; Pfizer, C; E.J. Higginbotham, Alcon Laboratories, R; Pfizer, R; Allergan Therapeutics, C; R.K. Parrish, II, Alcon Laboratories, C; Allergan Therapeutics, C; Bausch & Lomb, C; Pfizer, C; P.A. Morris, None; D.A. Dunn, None; B.S. Wilson, None; M.A. Kass, Pfizer, C.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Supported by grants from NEI & Natl Ctr on Minority Health & Health Disparities, NIH (EY09341, 09307, & Core Grant 062687), Merck, White House Station, Pfizer & unrestricted grant from RPB
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 204. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. O. Gordon, D. K. Heuer, E. J. Higginbotham, R. K. Parrish, II, P. A. Morris, D. A. Dunn, B. S. Wilson, M. A. Kass, The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study; Impact of Attributing Cause of Abnormality to POAG on Endpoint Rate and Statistical Power in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):204.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

1). to report the proportion of confirmed abnormalities in OHTS due to POAG or to "other causes" and 2). To assess statistical power of OHTS with "POAG" or "all cause" endpoints.

 
Methods:
 

A masked Endpoint Committee (DH, EH, RP) reviewed all confirmed visual field abnormalities and confirmed disc progression to determine whether the change was "most probably due to POAG", "most probably not due to POAG" or, in the case of disc progression, whether the progression was "not clinically significant" or an artifact. Endpoint committee members, masked as to treatment history, reviewed baseline and follow-up case report forms, visual fields and stereoscopic disc photographs of both eyes. Analysis dataset for this report includes the first confirmed abnormality of participants from the start of the study 2/94 to approximately 6/02.

 
Results:
 

The endpoint committee reviewed 509 confirmed abnormalities, 282 visual field abnormalities and 227 optic disc progressions. The endpoint committee attributed only 34% (97 of 282) of the visual field abnormalities and 45% (101 of 227) of the optic disc progression to POAG. Statistical power of OHTS to detect a treatment effect would have been 82% for all abnormalities compared to 99% for abnormalities due to POAG, 29% for all VF abnormalities compared to 96% for VF abnormalities due to POAG, and 99% for all optic disc progression and 99.9% for disc progression due to POAG.

 
Conclusions:
 

To protect the internal validity and statistical power of a clinical trial, the cause of visual field abnormalities and the cause and clinical significance of optic disc changes must be ascertained.  

 
Clinical Trial:
 

www.clinicaltrials.gov nct00000125

 
Keywords: clinical research methodology • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: treatment/prevention assessment/controlled clinical trials • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: biostatistics/epidemiology methodology 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×