April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
A Comparison of Reproducibility and Repeatability of Retinal Thickness and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Imaging Using the Spectralis Spectral Domain OCT in Healthy and Glaucomatous Adult and Pediatric Patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. Rajani
    Duke University Eye Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • B. C. Samuels
    Duke University Eye Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • S. Freedman
    Duke University Eye Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • S. G. Asrani
    Duke University Eye Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A. Rajani, None; B.C. Samuels, Allergan Horizon Grant, F; S. Freedman, None; S.G. Asrani, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 256. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. Rajani, B. C. Samuels, S. Freedman, S. G. Asrani; A Comparison of Reproducibility and Repeatability of Retinal Thickness and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Imaging Using the Spectralis Spectral Domain OCT in Healthy and Glaucomatous Adult and Pediatric Patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):256.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To compare intra-visit and inter-visit reproducibility of retinal thickness and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements amongst adult and pediatric patients using the Spectralis Spectral Domain OCT.

 
Methods:
 

One eye of 54 adult and 32 pediatric consented glaucoma patients, glaucoma suspects, or normal controls, were imaged using the Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering). Two baseline images were obtained at the initial visit as the reference scans. A retinal thickness map centered on the macula was obtained as a 30 X 25 degree raster scan with 61 lines(see figure). Next, a single circular RNFL thickness scan, set at 20 degrees, centered on the optic nerve was obtained. Both scans were then repeated twice the same day for intra-visit reproducibility and once on a separate day for inter-visit reproducibility. The retinal thickness measurements were calculated using inbuilt software, along a rectangular grid, and coefficient of variance (COV) was calculated for each 3x3 degree square. The COV of the average RNFL measurement as well as along six equally divided quadrants of the circle was calculated.

 
Results:
 

The average COV for all squares in the macular grid was 0.65% (adults) and 0.65% (pediatric) for the intra-visit measurements; and 0.76% (adults) and 0.66% (pediatric) for inter-visit comparison. RNFL thickness scans had an average COV of 2.38% (adults) and 2.28% (pediatric) for the intra-visit measurements; and 2.57% (adults) and 2.45% (pediatric) for inter-visit comparison.

 
Conclusions:
 

Reproducibility of macular thickness measurements were better than that of the peripapillary RNFL measurements in both adult and pediatric patients (p<0.05). Given the high reproducibility due to the tracking function of the Spectralis OCT, with the appropriate algorithm, both, retinal thickness and RNFL measurements may represent a reliable objective test to monitor glaucoma progression.  

 
Keywords: imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • imaging/image analysis: clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×