April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Parameters of Stimulation With Visual Cortical Prosthesis in Behavioral Feline Model
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. E. Ivanova
    Moscow Hospital Clinical Ophthalmology, Moscow, Russian Federation
    NCN RAMS, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • B. K. Baziyan
    Laboratory of neurocybernetics,
    NCN RAMS, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • S. A. Gordeev
    Laboratory of neurocybernetics,
    NCN RAMS, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.E. Ivanova, None; B.K. Baziyan, None; S.A. Gordeev, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Russian Humanitarian Scientific Fund # 08-06-00401a
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 422. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. E. Ivanova, B. K. Baziyan, S. A. Gordeev; Parameters of Stimulation With Visual Cortical Prosthesis in Behavioral Feline Model. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):422.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : To determine parameters for visual cortex stimulation evoking phosphene perception in feline behavioral model.

Methods: : 13 felines were tested for their ability to develop conditional food-obtaining reflex in response to "phosphene model". 11 of the 13 tested animals qualified for the experiment and were implanted with either subdural/intracortical iridium-oxide microelectrode array or a single aureated silver electrode, in V1 primary visual cortex. Animals were divided into 4 groups based on the localization of the implant and the diameter of the electrodes (0.05, 0.2, or 1.0 mm). Implantations were controlled using stereotaxic atlas and visual evoked potentials. At the end of surgeries, cranium bones were sealed with acryl oxide adhesive. Follow-up period was 8-12 months. Three categories of parameters affecting phosphene perception were measured: 1) brain-computer interface parameters: position of microelectrode tip, diameter of electrodes, and number of stimulated electrodes (1-8); 2) major phosphene-evoking parameters: current strength, pulse duration and impedance for stimulated electrodes; 3) variables: frequency of stimulation, impulse polarity, and duration of train impulses.

Results: : Preferable position of microelectrode tip was in 3rd-4th intracortical layers. Less current strength was needed with decrease in electrode diameter. Phosphene perception appeared when 3 or more electrodes were stimulated. Preferable frequency of stimulation was 25-100 Hz with bipolar -/+ impulses, at train duration of 1-2 s. Pulse duration was 0.3-1.0 ms for subdural and 0.1-0.5 for intracortical prostheses. Optimal intracortical current strength was 0.1-0.4 mA for 0.2-mm electrodes, and 0.02-0.1 mA for 0.05-mm electrodes. Subdural current strength was 1-4 mA for 1.0 mm electrodes, and 0.8-1.5 mA for 0.05-mm electrodes. Impedance for 0.05-mm electrodes achieved 50 kOm in 8 months after implantation, increasing a risk of neural cell damage.

Conclusions: : The obtained parameters allow for a long-term (up to 1 year) implantation of visual cortical prosthesis in felines. Further experiments are needed to evaluate longevity and longer-term biocompatibility of microelectrode arrays.

Keywords: visual cortex • neuro-ophthalmology: cortical function/rehabilitation • perception 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.