April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Is Intravitreal Bevacizumab an Effective Treatment Option for Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy?
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C. R. Prescott
    Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • C. A. Sklar
    Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • R. L. Lesser
    Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • R. A. Adelman
    Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  C.R. Prescott, None; C.A. Sklar, None; R.L. Lesser, None; R.A. Adelman, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  1 - Leir foundation 2 – Newman’s Own Foundation 3- Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 443. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C. R. Prescott, C. A. Sklar, R. L. Lesser, R. A. Adelman; Is Intravitreal Bevacizumab an Effective Treatment Option for Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy?. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):443.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) causes sudden, profound loss of vision with no known cause or cure. Various treatment modalities, both surgical (optic nerve sheath fenestration) and pharmacologic (intravitreal triamcinolone) have been tried without success. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab as a treatment option for NAION.

Methods: : We performed a retrospective study of patients with NAION who were treated with intravitreal bevacizumab to determine the therapeutic effect. We studied demographics of patients, and compared pre and post injection visual acuity, pre and post injection optic nerve status, and pre and post injection visual fields.

Results: : Four patients met the inclusion criteria. The injections were performed between 1 day and 5 weeks after presentation. The patients’ age ranged from 40 to 69 and there were 3 men and 1 woman. The average pre-injection visual acuity was logMAR 0.2 (range logMAR 0.00-0.9), and the mean post injection visual acuity was also logMAR 0.2 (range logMAR 0.00-0.4). The only patient whose visual acuity increased was the patient who presented initially with the worst visual acuity. Visual fields progressed in 3 patients and remained stable in the one patient whose vision improved. Two of the patients presented with altitudinal defects and developed field loss in the other hemisphere. One patient presented with a quadrantopsia and developed a near complete macular sparing scotoma. All four patients presented with optic disc edema with associated flame shaped hemorrhages. The edema decreased in all four patients; all subsequently developed varying degrees of optic atrophy. Only 25% of the patients in our study improved by measure of VA and none improved by visual field.

Conclusions: : Bevacizumab may not be an effective treatment option for NAION.

Keywords: neuro-ophthalmology: optic nerve • vascular endothelial growth factor • neuroprotection 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×