April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
The Effect of Pressure Variations and Length of Cutting Passes on the Accuracy of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Lenticle Creation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • L. J. Cervantes
    Ophthalmology, North Shore/LIJ Health System, Great Neck, New York
  • N. Ragusa
    Ophthalmology, North Shore/LIJ Health System, Great Neck, New York
  • C. Y. Shih
    Ophthalmology, North Shore/LIJ Health System, Great Neck, New York
  • I. J. Udell
    Ophthalmology, North Shore/LIJ Health System, Great Neck, New York
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  L.J. Cervantes, None; N. Ragusa, None; C.Y. Shih, None; I.J. Udell, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  ASCRS
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 774. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      L. J. Cervantes, N. Ragusa, C. Y. Shih, I. J. Udell; The Effect of Pressure Variations and Length of Cutting Passes on the Accuracy of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Lenticle Creation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):774.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To examine the effect of pressure and length of cutting pass on the accuracy of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) lenticle creation.

Methods: : 21 pairs of mate corneas were cut using the Moria artificial chamber system with a 300µ head. 12 pairs (24 corneas) were cut using 5 second passes, while 9 pairs (18 corneas) were cut with 10 second passes. The first eye of each pair was cut with a chamber pressure of <65mmHg. The second group, their donor mates, was cut with a chamber pressure of >65mmHg. Chamber pressure was checked with a Tono-Pen prior to the cut. Corneal thickness was measured by ultrasound pachymetry before and after cutting. The variation of the donor cap thickness from the expected 300µ [thicker cap/overcut (+); thinner cap/undercut (-)] was calculated.

Results: : Of the pairs cut with 5 second passes, the mean pressure of the <65mmHg group was 39±11 mmHg (range 15-50 mmHg). The mean pressure of the >65 mmHg group was 83±6.5 mmHg (range 69-89 mmHg). In 11 out of the 12 pairs (92%) the resultant donor caps of the <65mmHg group were closer to 300µ than those of the >65 mmHg group (p=0.004). In the <65 mmHg group, the mean difference was +86.5±57.8µ (range +169µ to -6µ). In the >65 mmHg group, the mean difference was +114±55.2µ (range +180µ to +21µ).Of the pairs cut with 10 second passes, the mean pressure of the <65 mmHg group was 34±10 mmHg (range 19-50 mmHg). The mean pressure of the >65 mmHg group was 88±0.9 mmHg (range 87-89 mmHg). In the <65 mmHg group, the mean difference from 300µ was +123µ±42.8µ (range +176µ to +42µ). In the >65 mmHg group, the mean difference was +116±37.1µ (range +178µ to +46µ). The two mean differences were not significantly different from each other.

Conclusions: : Donor cornea cuts made with 5 and 10 second passes at pressures above and below 65 mmHg were all associated with a significant amount of overcutting, producing thinner than anticipated lenticles. Cutting with 5 second passes at <65 mm Hg produced significantly more accurate cuts with the 300µ head when compared to longer pass lengths or higher pressures.

Keywords: cornea: clinical science • transplantation 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×