April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Comparative Study of Ranibizumab versus Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration With a 1+PRN Regimen
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. M. Carneiro
    Ophthalmology, Hospital Sao Joao/Oporto Medical School, Porto, Portugal
  • L. Mendonca
    Ophthalmology, Hospital Sao Joao, Porto, Portugal
  • M. Falcao
    Ophthalmology, Hospital Sao Joao/Oporto Medical School, Porto, Portugal
  • S. Fonseca
    Ophthalmology, Hospital Sao Joao, Porto, Portugal
  • E. Brandao
    Ophthalmology, Hospital Sao Joao, Porto, Portugal
  • F. Falcao-Reis
    Ophthalmology, Hospital Sao Joao/Oporto Medical School, Porto, Portugal
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A.M. Carneiro, None; L. Mendonca, None; M. Falcao, None; S. Fonseca, None; E. Brandao, None; F. Falcao-Reis, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Grant from Sociedade Portuguesa de Oftalmologia
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 903. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. M. Carneiro, L. Mendonca, M. Falcao, S. Fonseca, E. Brandao, F. Falcao-Reis; Comparative Study of Ranibizumab versus Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration With a 1+PRN Regimen. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):903.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To compare the safety and efficacy of intravitreal therapies with bevacizumab or ranibizumab for the treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using a 1 + PRN (pro re nata) regimen

Methods: : The six-month results of the first 60 consecutive eyes treated with ranibizumab (Group 1) for CNV secondary to AMD in our department were compared with 60 consecutive eyes treated with bevacizumab (Group 2) before availability of Lucentis®. None of the eyes had received previous treatment. At baseline mean age, mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using ETDRS charts and angiographic type of lesions were similar in both groups. Patients were evaluated monthly with BCVA and optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Results: : Mean initial BCVA was 20/160 for both groups (1: 37.8 vs 2: 39.5 letters; p=.68). At six months, there was a mean gain of 5.4 letters (p=.007) with ranibizumab, and 6.1 letters (p<.001) with bevacizumab. Visual gain results did not statistically differ between groups (p= .55). Significant visual gain (≥15 letters) occurred in 15 vs 12 eyes (1: 25.0% vs 2: 20.0%; p=.57). Mean initial foveal thickness was statistically different between groups (1: 330.2 vs 2: 265.9 µm; p=.021), but after six months this difference faded (1: 177.6 vs 2: 187.9 µm; p=.529). The mean number of treatments performed per eye during this six months follow-up was 4.63 for Group 1, and 4.15 for Group 2. This difference was statistically different (P = .04). Two acute cardiovascular events were registered during follow-up: one patient from Group 1 had a stroke, and another had a myocardial infarction in Group 2.

Conclusions: : Intravitreal therapies with ranibizumab or bevacizumab have good and similar visual outcomes in this small series and short-term analysis. The difference in mean initial foveal thickness might have determined a greater need for retreatment with ranibizumab. Longer and larger prospective clinical trials are needed to compare its efficacy and safety.

Keywords: age-related macular degeneration • choroid: neovascularization • vascular endothelial growth factor 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×