April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Morphological Prognostic Factors of Postoperative Visual Outcome in Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J. Jung
    Ophthalmology, Keimyung University DongsanMedicalCenter, Dae Gu, Republic of Korea
  • K. Kim
    Ophthalmology, Keimyung University DongsanMedicalCenter, Dae Gu, Republic of Korea
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J. Jung, None; K. Kim, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 1342. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J. Jung, K. Kim; Morphological Prognostic Factors of Postoperative Visual Outcome in Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):1342.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the morphological prognostic factors of postoperative visual outcome in idiopathic macular hole surgery.

Methods: : Fifty one patients (fifty one eyes) who had undergone vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole and followed up for at least 6months were included. Patients with the postoperative visual acuity (VA) < 20/50 and with VA ≥ 20/50 were designated as group 1 and group 2 respectively. As a subgroup, patients with postoperative normal-ranged foveal thickness (33 eyes) were divided into A and B group which had the postoperative VA < 20/50 or ≥ 20/50 respectively. Various morphological factors including preoperative base diameter (BD), minimum diameter (MD), hole height (HH), macular hole index (MHI), tractional hole index (THI), diameter hole index (DH) and hole form factor (HFF), and postoperative foveal thickness and foveal contour were analyzed by using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in all patients.

Results: : As the preoperative factors, group 2 (23 eyes) comparing to group 1 (28 eyes) had shorter BD (669.78±288.62µm vs. 999.28±583.35µm) and MD (338.65±197.03µm vs. 547.57±187.84µm ) (p=0.017 & 0.000, respectively), and larger MHI (0.67±0.25 vs. 0.46±0.21) and THI (1.49±0.89 vs. 0.80±0.35) (p=0.002 & 0.001, respectively). As the postoperative factors, group 2 had better foveal contour (65.2% vs. 32.1%) and thicker fovea (174.57±40.03 µm vs. 147.25±53.32 µm) (p=0.048 & 0.019, respectively). In subgroup, only preoperative THI was significantly larger in group B (18 eyes) than in group A (13 eyes) (1.25±0.57 vs. 0.81±0.31) (p=0.013).

Conclusions: : This study showed that the various morphological factors using OCT, especially THI and foveal contour, seemed to be helpful in estimation of the functional outcome in macular hole surgery.

Keywords: macular holes • vitreoretinal surgery • visual acuity 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×