April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Contrast Dependence of Vernier (VRN) Displacement Thresholds Assessed by Steady-State Sweep VEP Supports the Hypothesis That Magnocellular Input to Cortex Underlies VRN Performance
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R. D. Hamer
    Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California
    Departamento de Psicologia Experimental, IPUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • F. A. Carvalho
    Departamento de Psicologia Experimental, IPUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • D. F. Ventura
    Departamento de Psicologia Experimental, IPUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  R.D. Hamer, None; F.A. Carvalho, None; D.F. Ventura, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  FAPESP Grant 2007/52321-4, CNPq Grant 302527/2008-7
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 1498. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R. D. Hamer, F. A. Carvalho, D. F. Ventura; Contrast Dependence of Vernier (VRN) Displacement Thresholds Assessed by Steady-State Sweep VEP Supports the Hypothesis That Magnocellular Input to Cortex Underlies VRN Performance. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):1498.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Primate magnocellular (M) ganglion cells appear to have higher spatial precision (with higher SNR) than parvocellular (P) cells, and the dependence of M cell spatial precision on contrast (C), SF, TF and stimulus velocity is more similar to human psychophysical performance than comparable data from P cells (Ruttiger et al, 2002; Sun et al., 2003, 2004). These authors hypothesize that M ganglion cells provide the retinal signal to cortex adequate to support vernier performance. We measured the C-dependence of cortical vernier (VRN) thresholds (thd) using the Sweep VEP (sVEP) to help evaluate this hypothesis.

Methods: : sVEP thds were measured in 12 young adults with normal vision. Vertical VRN breaks in colinearity were introduced to a horizontal squarewave grating (12.7x9.4o; 2 c/d; mean lum = 161 cd/m2), generating 6 moving + 6 static interleaved vertical columns of bars, for a total of 418 VRN breaks. The VRN stimulus alternated between aligned (grating w/o breaks) and misaligned (w/breaks) states at 6 Hz. During each of ten, 10-s trials, displacement (D) was swept logarithmically from ≤ 0.5’ to ≤ 7.5’. VRN thd was defined as the D at which the rising slope of the vector averaged 1F response extrapolated to zero mV. Cs tested: 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 80%.

Results: : (1) Log VRN thd decreased linearly with log C with a slope of -0.5. (2) For C ≥ 16% , thds were hyperacuities (<1’). At high C, mean thd was 0.37’. (3) Thds for 2F had a different C-dependence, with little effect of C ≤ 16%. Thds for 2F were < 1F thds below 16% C, but were ≈ 1F thds beyond 16%. (4) The slopes of the sVEP extrapolation lines for 1F were 2-3 times > 2F slopes. (5) In a control protocol, symmetric, bidirectional displacements only generated 2F responses. (6) When the static and moving columns of bars had different Cs (16% moving; variable C static), a 1F response occurred when the static-bar C was as low as 1-2% C. No 1F occurred when the static bar had 0% C.

Conclusions: : Results 3-5 imply that the 1F and 2F components derive from distinct neurons, and support the notion that 2F responses reflect symmetric cortical motion responses. The C-dependence of sVEP VRN (1F) thresholds is similar to prior psychophysics, and recapitulates M-cell C-dependence (Wehrhahn & Westheimer, 1990; Sun et al., 2003, 2004). Results 1 and 6 support the hypothesis that cortex extracts relative position information with hyperacuity precision preferentially from M cell signals.

Keywords: visual cortex • electrophysiology: non-clinical • ganglion cells 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×