April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Role of T Cell Recruitment and Endogenous Endostatin Production in Corneal Allograft Rejection
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • N. J. Cutrufello
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
  • Y. Tan
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
  • C. A. Medina-Mendez
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
  • R. E. Martinez
    Ophthalmology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
  • J. Echegaray
    Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
  • V. L. Perez
    Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  N.J. Cutrufello, None; Y. Tan, None; C.A. Medina-Mendez, None; R.E. Martinez, None; J. Echegaray, None; V.L. Perez, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  R01 EY018624-01 (VLP), K08 EY014912-05 (VLP), P30 EY014801, Research to Prevent Blindness
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 1552. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      N. J. Cutrufello, Y. Tan, C. A. Medina-Mendez, R. E. Martinez, J. Echegaray, V. L. Perez; Role of T Cell Recruitment and Endogenous Endostatin Production in Corneal Allograft Rejection. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):1552.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Previously we showed that administration of exogenous endostatin increases survival of corneal allografts. This suggests that this antiangiogenic factor plays an important role in the survival of corneal allografts. In this work we further investigate the relationship of endostatin and immune responses in corneal transplantation

Methods: : Orthotopic complete MHC mismatched corneal allotransplants (C57BL/6 →Balb/c) and syngenic transplants (Balb/c →Balb/c) were performed. Clinical scores were done at days 0, 1, 3, 7, 10, 20, & 40 after surgery and at similar time points eyes were frozen, sectioned and corneal protein lystates were prepared. Endostatin production was assessed by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and recruitment of T-cells was quantified by immunohistochemistry.

Results: : Endostatin was present in both allogenic and syngeneic corneal grafts at post operative day (POD) 0, and steadily increased and peaked at POD10 . In syngeneic grafts, the levels of endostatin remained elevated through POD40. In contrast, allogeneic grafts, had a significantly decreased production of endostatin. Graft survival correlated with endostatin production. Rejection of allogeneic grafts began after the decreased production of endostatin on POD10, while syngeneic graft survival was 100%. The decrease in endostatinin corneal allografts also correlated with the increase influx of T-cells into the graft.

Conclusions: : Our data suggests that endostatin is produced after corneal transplantation as a potential mechanism to prevent neovascularization and graft failure. The fact that a decreased endostatin production is observed in only rejected corneal allograft infiltrated by T cells, suggests a close relationship between immunity and neovascularization. We propose a novel hypothesis that alloimmune recognition and immune responses are the first critical step in the regulation of angiogensis in corneal allotransplation.

Keywords: immunomodulation/immunoregulation • transplantation • inflammation 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×