April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Rhodopsin Kinase Expression Level and Its Effect on Recovery Phase
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • K. Sakurai
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Washington University, Sch Med, Saint Louis, Missouri
  • S. C. Khani
    Ophthalmology, Schepens Eye Research Inst, Boston, Massachusetts
  • V. J. Kefalov
    Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Washington University, Sch Med, Saint Louis, Missouri
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  K. Sakurai, None; S.C. Khani, None; V.J. Kefalov, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant EY016662 (SCK), EY13600 (SCK), EY019312 (VJK), RPB Career Development Award (VJK)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 2041. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      K. Sakurai, S. C. Khani, V. J. Kefalov; Rhodopsin Kinase Expression Level and Its Effect on Recovery Phase. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):2041.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : Rhodopsin kinase (GRK1) phosphorylates light-activated rhodopsin. Previous studies indicate that in dark-adapted rods rhodopsin inactivation by GRK1 is required but not rate-limiting for proper flash response termination. However it is not known whether GRK1 phosphorylation affects rod function during dark- or light adaptation. To address this question, we investigated the function of rods from Grk1 transgenic mice (Grk1-ox), with 3-fold higher expression of GRK1 compared to wild type (WT).

Methods: : Using a suction electrode, we recorded membrane currents from singe rod photoreceptors of Grk1-ox mice and WT littermates. We compared their dim flash sensitivity, time-to-peak, integration time (Tint), and recovery time constant (τrec) as well as their dominant time constant of recovery (τD). We also investigated how GRK1 affects the recovery of dark current following a bleach and the PDE adaptation in background light of various intensities to lower rod [Ca2+]i.

Results: : Rising phase and time-to-peak of dim flash response of Grk1-ox rods were comparable with WT rods. However, τrec and Tint were shortened significantly by Grk1 overexpression (τrec: 275 ± 17 ms (n = 36) for WT rod and 200 ± 16 ms (n = 21) for Grk1-ox rod; Tint: 356 ± 21 ms (n = 36) for WT rod and 254 ± 15 ms (n = 21) for Grk1-ox rod). Notably, unlike τrec, τD was not affected by GRK1 overexpression (269 ± 13 ms (n = 26) for WT and 274 ± 17 ms (n = 14) for Grk1-ox). After a 3% rhodopsin bleach, the recovery of dark current was accelerated significantly from 5.5 ± 0.8 min (n = 10) in WT to 2.9 ± 0.6 min (n = 9) in Grk1-ox rods. The [Ca2+]i-dependent acceleration of response termination observed in WT rods was essentially absent in Grk1-ox rods indicating no PDE adaptation in background light.

Conclusions: : Surprisingly, GRK1 overexpression accelerated rod dim flash response shutoff indicating that rhodopsin inactivation could be rate-limiting. Enhancing rhodopsin inactivation also affected dark adaptation and background adaptation. The lack of PDE adaptation in Grk1-ox rods could explain the uncoupling of τrec and τD, believed until now to both reflect transducin inactivation.

Keywords: electroretinography: non-clinical • photoreceptors • phosphorylation 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.