April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Comparison of Combined Therapy of Intravitreal Injection of Avastin and Macugen versus Mono-Therapy. The MAAM Study-a Pilot Study
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • K. E. Schmid-Kubista
    Ophthalmology, Rudolf Foundation Clinic, Vienna, Austria
  • I. Krebs
    Ophthalmology, Rudolf Foundation Clinic, Vienna, Austria
  • S. Ansari Shahrezaei
    Ophthalmology, Rudolf Foundation Clinic, Vienna, Austria
  • P. Haas
    Ophthalmology, Rudolf Foundation Clinic, Vienna, Austria
  • S. Hagen
    Ophthalmology, Rudolf Foundation Clinic, Vienna, Austria
  • S. Binder
    Ophthalmology, Rudolf Foundation Clinic, Vienna, Austria
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  K.E. Schmid-Kubista, None; I. Krebs, None; S. Ansari Shahrezaei, None; P. Haas, None; S. Hagen, None; S. Binder, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 2056. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      K. E. Schmid-Kubista, I. Krebs, S. Ansari Shahrezaei, P. Haas, S. Hagen, S. Binder; Comparison of Combined Therapy of Intravitreal Injection of Avastin and Macugen versus Mono-Therapy. The MAAM Study-a Pilot Study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):2056.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

A prospective randomized masked pilot study to investigate the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy of Bevacizumab applied first and with Pegaptanib used for retreatment.

 
Materials and Methods:
 

Subjects diagnosed with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration, a predominantly occult lesion composition, and with best corrected visual acuity of 20/40 to 20/200 in the absence of subfoveal atrophy or scarring in the trial eye were included. Subjects were randomized equally to receive 3 intravitreal injections, every 6 weeks, of either 0.3mg Pegaptanib, 1mg of Bevacizumab, or first 1mg Bevacizumab followed by retreatment of 0.3mg Pegaptanib. Best corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and retinal thickness measurements were performed after 1, 6, 12 weeks, and after 6 months.

 
Results:
 

Forty-eight subjects were included, of which 13 were randomized to receive only Bevacizumab, 18 received only Pegaptanib, and 17 received first Bevacizumab, followed by Pegaptanib. Bevacizumab lead to significant changes in visual acuity after 6 weeks throughout the entire follow up of 6 months, while retinal thickness only showed significant changes after 6 to 12 weeks. Pegaptanib showed a significant decrease in retinal thickness only after 6 weeks, and a change in visual acuity after 6 months. However, contrast sensitivity increased significantly after 12 weeks and 6 months. The combined treatment with Bevacizumab, followed by Pegaptanib showed a decrease in retinal thickness after 12 weeks.  

 
Conclusions:
 

Bevacizumab, as sole treatment, lead to more significant changes in visual acuity, and retinal thickness, than Pegaptanib or the combined treatment of both monoclonal antibodies. Pegaptanib had a positive influence on contrast sensitivity. We conclude that the combined treatment of Bevacizumab with Pegaptanib is safe, but the single treatment of Bevacizumab is more efficient.

 
Clinical Trial:
 

www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00531336

 
Keywords: age-related macular degeneration • choroid: neovascularization 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×