April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Comparison of Intravitreal Bevacizumab versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic Myopia - 6 Month Results
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. Fonseca
    Ophthalmology, Hospital S. Joao, Porto, Portugal
  • Â. Carneiro
    Ophthalmology, Hospital S. Joao, Porto, Portugal
  • L. Mendonça
    Ophthalmology, Hospital S. Joao, Porto, Portugal
  • M. Falcão
    Ophthalmology, Hospital S. Joao, Porto, Portugal
  • E. Brandão
    Ophthalmology, Hospital S. Joao, Porto, Portugal
  • F. Falcão-Reis
    Ophthalmology, Hospital S. Joao, Porto, Portugal
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S. Fonseca, None; Â. Carneiro, None; L. Mendonça, None; M. Falcão, None; E. Brandão, None; F. Falcão-Reis, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 2222. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. Fonseca, Â. Carneiro, L. Mendonça, M. Falcão, E. Brandão, F. Falcão-Reis; Comparison of Intravitreal Bevacizumab versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Pathologic Myopia - 6 Month Results. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):2222.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To compare the safety and efficacy of intravitreal therapies with bevacizumab and ranibizumab for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathologic myopia (PM).

Methods: : Prospective, nonrandomized, cohort study. The 6 month results of 25 eyes treated with 1.25mg of intravitreal bevacizumab (Group 1) for CNV secondary to PM were compared with 19 eyes treated with 0.5 mg of intravitreal ranibizumab (Group 2). We used a 1 plus PRN schedule in both groups. Patients were evaluated monthly with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using ETDRS charts and OCT. Fluorescein angiography (FA) was performed every three months or when necessary. Retreatment decision was based on the presence of metamorphopsia, fluid on OCT, and/or leakage on FA. At baseline mean age, mean BCVA and angiographic type of lesions were similar in both groups.

Results: : The mean age was 58.8 years. The baseline mean BCVA was 35.8 letters in group 1 and 43.7 letters in group 2. Both groups gained letters in 6 months , a mean of +10.7 letters in group 1 and +13.2 letters in group 2, with no statistical differences between the 2 groups (p=0.575). At 1 month the mean BCVA improved significantly in bevacizumab (+6.9 letters, p=0.002) and in ranibizumab groups (+6.3 letters, p=0.041). In group 1, 88.0% (n=22) of the patients improved vision, 24.0 % (n=6) gained 15 or more letters and none lost 15 or more letters. In group 2, 89.5% (n=17) of the patients improved vision, 26.3% (n=5) gained 15 or more letters and none lost 15 or more letters. The rate of injections was the same in both groups, 0,59 injections per month per patient. No cases of severe visual acuity loss nor systemic side-effects were observed.

Conclusions: : Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab are safe and effective in treating CNV secondary to PM. During the first six months, both drugs have similar visual results. This is a small and nonrandomized series; prospective and randomized clinical trials are needed to ascertain these findings.

Keywords: choroid: neovascularization • myopia • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: outcomes/complications 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×