April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Measurement of Pain During 23 Gauge Vitrectomy With Topical Anesthesia
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J. Lesso-Zamora
    Retina, Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México, Mexico City, Mexico
  • J. Guerrero-Naranjo
    Retina, Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México, Mexico City, Mexico
  • J. De la Luz-Osnaya
    Retina, Instituto de Seguridad Social del Estado de México y Municipios, Mexico City, Mexico
  • A. Morales-Delgado
    Retina, Instituto de Seguridad Social del Estado de México y Municipios, Mexico City, Mexico
  • M. Martínez-Castellanos
    Retina, Asociación Para Evitar la Ceguera en México, Mexico City, Mexico
    Retina, Instituto de Seguridad Social del Estado de México y Municipios, Mexico City, Mexico
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J. Lesso-Zamora, None; J. Guerrero-Naranjo, None; J. De la Luz-Osnaya, None; A. Morales-Delgado, None; M. Martínez-Castellanos, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 2565. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J. Lesso-Zamora, J. Guerrero-Naranjo, J. De la Luz-Osnaya, A. Morales-Delgado, M. Martínez-Castellanos; Measurement of Pain During 23 Gauge Vitrectomy With Topical Anesthesia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):2565.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To assess the intraoperative pain during 23 gauge vitrectomy with topical anesthesia (TA).

Methods: : Experimental, transversal study. Patients scheduled for 23 gauge vitrectomy using TA and the new generation of Alcon trocars, (Alcon, Forth Worth, TX) were included. All patients accepted the procedure and signed an informed consent. Intravenous sedation with 0.5mg/Kg midazolam as a single dose was administered before the procedure. Instillation of tetracaine solution (5mg/ml) drops was performed two minutes before the procedure. A mixture of 1cc of lidocaine hydrochloride 2% and 9cc of hidroxypropilmethylcellulose 2% was prepared before surgery, and was applied over the cornea during the procedure, every time the vitrectomy lens was removed. A numeric scale of 0 to 10 was used to assed the pain where 0 equaled no pain and 10 equaled the most severe pain ever experienced by the patient.

Results: : A total of 32 consecutive patients were included. Four patients had diagnosis of macular hole (MH), six of epiretinal membrane (ERM) and 22 patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). The average operative time was 40 minutes (range: 18 minutes to 50 minutes). Thirty one patients (99%) reported a pain scale of three or less. Two patients with PDR graded their pain in level 3; another 25 patients graded the pain in level 2 (three with MH, four with ERM and 18 with PDR). Two patients (one with PDR and one with ERM) reported a pain scale of 1. Two patients (one with MH and other with ERM) graded a level 0 of pain. Only one patient with PDR graded the level of pain as 6, and required a subconjuntival injection of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride and an extra dose of IV midazolam to complete the procedure. Pain was experienced especially during the sclerotomies.

Conclusions: : Topical anesthesia is a feasible option in small gauge vitreoretinal surgery with the added benefit of reducing the risk of retro or periocular complications.

Clinical Trial: : www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01022879

Keywords: vitreoretinal surgery 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×