April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
3-T Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Optic Nerve Changes in Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. T. Chang
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences,
    Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri
  • J. Xu
    Department of Radiology,
    Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri
  • K. M. Trinkaus
    Division of Biostatistics,
    Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri
  • S.-K. Song
    Department of Radiology,
    Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri
  • E. M. Barnett
    Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences,
    Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S.T. Chang, None; J. Xu, None; K.M. Trinkaus, None; S.-K. Song, None; E.M. Barnett, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Allergan Horizon Fellowship Grant
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 2711. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. T. Chang, J. Xu, K. M. Trinkaus, S.-K. Song, E. M. Barnett; 3-T Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Optic Nerve Changes in Glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):2711.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : (1) To compare the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) indices mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) between adult subjects with and without glaucoma. (2) To correlate these DTI indices with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph (HRT) indices rim area (RA) and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) and also with the clinical stage of glaucomatous visual field damage.

Methods: : Subjects were recruited from the Washington University Eye Center. Subjects were enrolled into one of two groups ("glaucoma" or "normal") based on an established diagnosis which was confirmed through a complete eye exam. MR images were acquired for all subjects using a 4-element phased array custom-fabricated receiver coil on a 3T scanner (Trio, Siemens). Oblique transaxial diffusion weighted images were acquired (FOV 166x72 mm, matrix 128x56, and TR/TE ~8000/103 ms) on nine interleaved gapless slices of 1.3 mm thick, using a previously described reduced field of view (rFOV). A HRT was prospectively performed for the majority of the subjects within 9 months of their DTI. Every eye was given a clinical stage based on the Modified Bascom Palmer Glaucoma Staging System. A repeated measures linear model was used to compare the DTI indices between the two groups and also to correlate these indices with RA, RNFLT, and clinical stage of glaucoma.

Results: : All four of the DTI indices were statistically different between glaucoma and normal subjects. Log mean MD for the glaucoma eyes was significantly greater compared to normal eyes (1.33 vs. 0.91 µm2/ms, p=0.0002) while log mean FA was significantly lower for the glaucoma versus normal eyes (0.21 vs. 0.44, p < 0.0001). Axial (1.70 vs 1.43 µm2/ms, p=0.036) and radial (1.24 vs. 0.71 µm2/ms, p < 0.0001) diffusivities were significantly greater in the glaucoma versus normal eyes. There were significant inverse correlations between RA and MD, RA and RD, RA and AD, RNFLT and MD, and RNFLT and RD. There were significant direct correlations between RA and FA, and RNFLT and FA. MD, RD, and AD increased while FA decreased significantly as the clinical stage of glaucoma worsened.

Conclusions: : DTI can distinguish between optic nerves affected by glaucoma and unaffected controls. MD, FA, and RD are strongly correlated with RA and RNFLT while there was a weaker relationship between AD and these HRT indices. Similarly, MD, FA, and RD strongly correlated while AD had a weaker dependence on the clinical stage of glaucoma.

Keywords: optic nerve • imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • imaging/image analysis: clinical 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×