April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Agreement and Repeatability of Different Disc-Definition Methods for Optic Nerve Head and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements with the RTVue-100 Optical Coherence Tomograph
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. Garas
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
  • P. Vargha
    BiometryUnit,
    Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
  • G. Holló
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A. Garas, None; P. Vargha, None; G. Holló, Optovue Inc., F.
  • Footnotes
    Support  National Health Grant (ETT) 001/2009 (Dr. Holló)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 2754. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. Garas, P. Vargha, G. Holló; Agreement and Repeatability of Different Disc-Definition Methods for Optic Nerve Head and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements with the RTVue-100 Optical Coherence Tomograph. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):2754.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

To evaluate the repeatability and agreement of the optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) measurements as made with automatic, operator-adjusted, and manual defined disc-definition functions of the RTVue-100 Fourier-domain optical coherence tomograph (RTVue OCT), and to asses the between-methods differences.

 
Methods:
 

One eye of 126 persons (72 glaucomatous, 10 ocular hypertensive (OHT), 44 healthy eyes) was analyzed with all three disc-definition functions of the RTVue OCT. Thirty-three eyes were imaged 5 times for determination of measurement repeatability.

 
Results:
 

Repeatability with automatic disc-definition was significantly poorer than the other options, but did not differ between the manual and operator-adjusted methods. Refractive error, disease category (glaucoma, OHT or normal) or peripapillary atrophy had no influence on repeatability. Similar between-method differences were seen for eyes irrespective of glaucoma, refractive error, or parapapillary atrophy. High intraclass correlation (93.5% to 99.9%) was seen for all parameters measured with manual and operator-adjusted methods. Agreement of classifications (normal, borderline, outside normal limits) was better for RNFLT parameters than disc parameters, and the kappa-values were highest (0.881 to 0.968) in comparing the manual and operator-adjusted methods.

 
Conclusions:
 

Measurement repeatability, measured parameter values and classification with manual and operator-adjusted disc-definition functions of the RTVue OCT are similar and are not influenced by refractive error, glaucoma, or parapapillary atrophy. Operator-adjusted disc-definition, which is faster than the conventional manual disc definition, can be useful for glaucoma detection with the RTVue OCT.  

 
Keywords: nerve fiber layer • imaging/image analysis: clinical • optic disc 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×