April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Evaluation of Amniotic Membrane Treatments in Reducing Haze After Photorefractive Keratectomy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • H. A. Hashem
    Ophthalmology, Research Institute of Ophthalmology, Cairo, Egypt
  • L. Liang
    Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China
  • H. Sheha
    Ophthalmology, Ocular Surface Center, Miami, Florida
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  H.A. Hashem, None; L. Liang, None; H. Sheha, TissueTech, Inc, E.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 2858. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      H. A. Hashem, L. Liang, H. Sheha; Evaluation of Amniotic Membrane Treatments in Reducing Haze After Photorefractive Keratectomy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):2858. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : To evaluate the effect of amniotic membrane patch graft (AMG) versus amniotic membrane extract (AME) on re-epithelialization time, postoperative pain, haze and refractive outcome after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia.

Methods: : 20 patients undergoing bilateral PRK for correction of myopia were randomized to receive AM treatment in one eye: AMG (8.0 mm disc) attached to a bandage contact lens (BCL) or AME (100 µg/ml eye drops) with BCL. The fellow eye of each patient was treated with BCL and placebo. In addition, all patients received routine antibiotic steroid eye drops. Visual Analogue Pain Charts were used to record pain levels for 4 days after surgery. Serial digitized retro-illumination photography was used to assess rates of epithelial healing. The BCLs were removed after one week, and the relative haze scale was quantified, and surface epithelial quality was monitored using topography. At 6-month period, visual performance was assessed by measuring refractive outcome, best-corrected visual acuity, objective haze, halo, and glare.

Results: : The preoperative findings were overall statistically similar between groups; the mean spherical equivalent refraction was -5.5 ± 1.5 D. Overall pain scores were higher with BCL alone at 1 day (P =.001) and 4 days (P =.025). There was no statistically significant difference in pain scores between AMG and AME groups (P=.62). Re-epithelialization was completed after three days, without any significant difference between groups. At 1 week, all patients showed topographic irregularity that completely resolved by 1 month. Haze was significantly reduced in AMG and AME groups. No statistically significant difference was seen between treatment groups in any of the parameters monitoring visual performance.

Conclusions: : Amniotic membrane as a tissue or extract did not affect re-epithelialization time, but appears to potentially reduce postoperative pain and haze that can impact visual performance following PRK.

Keywords: refractive surgery • refractive surgery: PRK • refractive surgery: complications 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.