April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Patient Decision-Making in Eye Care Service Selection: Lessons From a New Model of Community-Based Eye Care Delivery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • P. M. O'Connor
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Australia
  • K. Fotis
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Australia
  • J. E. Keeffe
    Centre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  P.M. O'Connor, None; K. Fotis, None; J.E. Keeffe, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing; Vision CRC
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 3242. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      P. M. O'Connor, K. Fotis, J. E. Keeffe; Patient Decision-Making in Eye Care Service Selection: Lessons From a New Model of Community-Based Eye Care Delivery. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):3242.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To identify the key factors that determined patient decision-making in eye care service selection.

Methods: : A new model of eye care service delivery was trialled by the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital (RVEEH) in Melbourne, Australia for patients with stable age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR) and glaucoma. Eligible patients were offered the option of having on-going monitoring of their eye conditions by specific local urban and rural primary care providers (optometrists/general practitioners) rather than at the RVEEH, a tertiary hospital. Patients who used the community-based eye care were compared with those who remained at the RVEEH to determine the key factors that underpinned their respective decisions. Interviews were conducted with a sub-set of accepters and decliners. A combination of quantitative and qualitative methodologies was used.

Results: : One-hundred and seventy nine eligible patients were approached to participate (mean±SD age 69.9, ±11.9 years; 51% female). Of these, 103 accepted, 69 declined and 7 deferred their decisions. Among those interviewed (n=46), 83% self-reported having little or no difficulties with their vision; few either sought family advice before deciding (6%) or had any concerns about attending a local practitioner (10%). Transport-related factors (36%) and personal preference (25%) dominated the reasons why patients declined (n=69). Among interviewed accepters (n=37), 68% indicated that being individually approached by the RVEEH influenced their decision while 81% found it easier and substantially more timesaving to travel locally. Analysis of acceptance and decline rates by location showed a significant association between patients’ decisions and distance (X2=17.56; p=0.007) with higher acceptance rates evident for those located most distant from the RVEEH.

Conclusions: : Transport-related factors played an important role in patient decision-making in eye care service selection. This has important implications for planning eye care service as distance and the travel logistics can be barriers or facilitators to service selection.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: health care delivery/economics/manpower 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×