April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Heading Precision in Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD): Effects of Directional Noise
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J. V. Odom
    Ophthalmology,
    West Virginia Univ Eye Inst, Morgantown, West Virginia
  • J. O. Mali
    Ophthalmology,
    West Virginia Univ Eye Inst, Morgantown, West Virginia
  • M. J. Leys
    West Virginia Univ Eye Inst, Morgantown, West Virginia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J.V. Odom, None; J.O. Mali, None; M.J. Leys, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  EY 14841; RPB unrestricted grant
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 3619. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J. V. Odom, J. O. Mali, M. J. Leys; Heading Precision in Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD): Effects of Directional Noise. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):3619. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Our previous research indicated that noise had little effect on heading precision of normals and diabetic retinopathy patients, but affected AMD patients with 20/60 or worse binocular best corrected visual acuity (BBCVA). We tested the effects of noise on thresholds of treated AMD patients with BBCVA of 20/40 or better to determine if factors other than acuity cause the loss. Normal groups aged either 21-59 years or 60 years or more and AMD patients with 20/60 or worse BBCVA were compared to the new AMD group.

Methods: : Observers were seated 50 cm from a display that subtended 44.6 arc deg horizontally. White dots on a black background appeared at random locations and moved away from a focus of expansion (FOE). The observers’ task was to determine if the FOE was to the right or left of center. A double staircase was employed to determine a threshold precision for the FOEs. Threshold precision was ½ the difference of the staircase thresholds. Observers repeated the judgments under 4 conditions: a no noise condition and 3 conditions in which the individual flow vectors were perturbed by Gaussian noise along the x-axis. The noise standard deviation (SD) varied from 0.92 to 2.75 deg.

Results: : ANOVA indicated significant effects of group, noise and their interaction (p<0.01). Without noise, there was no significant difference in heading precision between the AMD groups and the older normals (p > 0.10). Older normals had higher thresholds than younger normals; however, increasing noise did not increase thresholds in either normal group over the range tested, i.e., the slope of the functions relating noise to precision did not differ from 0 (p > 0.1). However, as noise levels increased, heading precision thresholds increased for the AMD groups. The greatest differences between groups occurred at the highest noise level (p < 0.01); i.e., in both AMD groups the slopes differed statistically from 0 (p < 0.03).

Conclusions: : Noise with a SD up to 2.75 deg does not impair heading precision in normals but does impair that of AMD patients, even if their BBCVA is 20/40 or better. Poor BBCVA is not be the only cause of impaired precision of heading judgments in AMD patients.

Keywords: optic flow • age-related macular degeneration • age-related macular degeneration 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×