April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Monocular Bioptic Telescopes May Not Be a Hazard When Driving
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. L. Doherty
    Schepens Eye Research Institute, Dept Ophthalmology, Harvard Med School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • A. R. Bowers
    Schepens Eye Research Institute, Dept Ophthalmology, Harvard Med School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • E. Peli
    Schepens Eye Research Institute, Dept Ophthalmology, Harvard Med School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A.L. Doherty, None; A.R. Bowers, None; E. Peli, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH grant EY12890
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 3624. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. L. Doherty, A. R. Bowers, E. Peli; Monocular Bioptic Telescopes May Not Be a Hazard When Driving. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):3624.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Magnification causes a blind area (ring scotoma) around the telescopic view that has been suggested as a danger potentially impairing detection of traffic hazards when driving with bioptics. We evaluated the ability of the fellow (non-telescope) eye to detect stimuli in the area of the ring scotoma (bi-ocular multiplexing) when using a monocular bioptic. We investigated the effect of background complexity, viewing task, and experience using a bioptic on this ability.

Methods: : To date, 14 subjects have completed the study: 9 experienced and 5 naïve bioptic users. All subjects used a monocular 3x bioptic telescope (Ocutech Mini or Designs for Vision) for the experiment. A dichoptic computerized perimeter (Woods et al, J Biomedical Optics, in press) was used to measure central visual fields with and without the bioptic; a suprathreshold stimulus was used for all tests. To avoid ceiling effects, contrast of the stimuli were adjusted so that the detection rate without bioptic was <90%. The bioptic ring scotoma was mapped presenting the stimulus to the telescope eye only. Each subject then performed a series of detection tasks under binocular viewing with stimuli presented to only the fellow eye within the area of the ring scotoma. Fellow-eye detection rates were determined with and without the bioptic on simple plain grey and more visually-complex noise image backgrounds in passive (looking at fixation cross) or active (reading letters) viewing tasks.

Results: : There were no significant differences in fellow-eye detection rates with and without the bioptic (means 79% and 80%; p=0.731); this was true for the two backgrounds (p=0.161) and both experienced and naïve users (p=0.824). As expected, there was a significant reduction in detection rates on the noise background compared to the grey background (71% and 88%, p < 0.001) and with the active task compared to the passive task (75% and 84%, p = 0.006).

Conclusions: : Preliminary analyses suggest that both naïve and experienced bioptic users are able to use the fellow eye to detect stimuli in the ring scotoma on a complex background while actively viewing through a monocular bioptic. These results appear promising for monocular bioptic drivers.

Keywords: low vision • binocular vision/stereopsis 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×