April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Temporal Modulation Can Improve Visual Performance in Low-Vision Patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • L. M. Watson
    Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • N. C. Strang
    Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • V. Manahilov
    Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • L. Gilmour
    Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  L.M. Watson, None; N.C. Strang, None; V. Manahilov, None; L. Gilmour, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  College of Optometrists and Wellcome Trust
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 3633. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      L. M. Watson, N. C. Strang, V. Manahilov, L. Gilmour; Temporal Modulation Can Improve Visual Performance in Low-Vision Patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):3633.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To investigate whether contrast sensitivity to gratings of low spatial frequency can be improved by modulating the contrast over time in low vision patients.

Methods: : 8 low vision subjects with Log Mar Acuity ranging from 0.3 to 1.68 were recruited. Subjects participated with informed consent in the study. Subjects all had been clinically diagnosed with age related macular degeneration. Sensitivity was measured using low spatial frequency gratings (0.5c/deg) orientated at 45 or -45 deg from vertical. Threshold contrasts were determined using a one-interval two-alternative forced choice procedure in conjunction with a staircase method. In Experiment 1, grating contrast was reversed sinusoidally in counterphase at temporal frequencies of 0 (non-modulated control), 5, 10 and 20 Hz. In Experiment 2, three types of random grating contrast modulation were used: (1) additive - adding uniform luminance of 3cd/m² to the stimulus luminance profile; (2) divisive - reducing grating luminance by a factor of 10% (3) motion - changing grating phase.

Results: : Temporal contrast sensitivity in low vision subjects had a band pass form. In Experiment 1, contrast sensitivity was maximal at 10Hz and reduced at lower and higher temporal frequencies. The mean increase in sensitivity was 0.18 log units. In Experiment 2, random motion and divisive modulations conditions significantly (t-test with Bonferroni correction, p<0.05) increased the sensitivity of the subjects compared to that for stationary gratings. Random motion resulted in a mean increase in sensitivity of 0.25 log units and divisive modulations resulted in a 0.18 log unit increase.

Conclusions: : Low vision subjects perceive a world of blurred images which contain mainly low spatial frequencies. This study has shown a band pass temporal contrast sensitivity function for low vision subjects. Therefore modulating the retinal image of low spatial frequencies to the optimal temporal frequency can improve contrast sensitivity to stationary gratings. Random motion and divisive noise improve contrast sensitivity without the tiring repetition of sinusoidal reversal. These parameters can be utilised to develop new types of low vision aids.

Keywords: age-related macular degeneration • temporal vision • contrast sensitivity 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×