April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Binocularity Improves Performance to Defocus-Induced Blur
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. Plainis
    IVO - School of Health Sciences, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
  • D. Petratou
    IVO - School of Health Sciences, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
  • T. Giannakopoulou
    IVO - School of Health Sciences, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
  • D. A. Atchison
    Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation and School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
  • M. K. Tsilimbaris
    IVO - School of Health Sciences, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S. Plainis, None; D. Petratou, None; T. Giannakopoulou, None; D.A. Atchison, None; M.K. Tsilimbaris, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 3936. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. Plainis, D. Petratou, T. Giannakopoulou, D. A. Atchison, M. K. Tsilimbaris; Binocularity Improves Performance to Defocus-Induced Blur. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):3936.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose: : To evaluate the advantage of binocular vision over monocular vision under blurred conditions using visual acuity measures and pattern Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) recordings.

Methods: : There were thirteen subjects (age: 28±5 years) with decimal visual acuities better than 1.0 in both eyes. All measurements were performed monocularly (dominant eye) and binocularly at 1m viewing distance with best spectacle sphero-cylindrical correction and natural pupils. Blur was induced using positive powered lenses up to +3.50 D. Visual acuity was measured with the LogMAR 2000 "new ETDRS" charts (Precision Vision, USA). VEPs were elicited using reversing 10 arcmin checks at a rate of 4 reversals per second with square wave modulation. The stimulus was displayed on a Sony GDM F-520 CRT monitor by means of a VSG 2/5 stimulus generator card (Cambridge Research Systems Ltd, UK). The stimulus subtended a circular field of 7 degrees with 100% contrast, and a mean luminance of 30 cd/m2. Each VEP trace was the average of 64 epochs of 1 sec duration each.

Results: : With binocular stimulation the amplitude and the implicit time of the P100 component of the VEPs were greater and shorter, respectively, in all cases than for monocular stimulation. Specifically, the mean (± standard deviation) of the binocular enhancement ratio in the P100 amplitude was 1.8 (±0.6) at 0.0D defocus, increasing linearly with defocus to be 2.9 at +3.50 D. The mean peak latency was 1.4 ms (±3.5) shorter at 0.0D defocus with binocular than for monocular stimulation, with the difference increasing exponentially with defocus to 12.3 ms (± 11.7) at +3.00 D. Similar to the effects for the VEP amplitude, visual acuity was always better with binocular than with monocular vision, with the difference being greater the higher the defocus.

Conclusions: : Both subjective and objective results show that binocular vision ameliorates the effect of defocus blur, especially for higher levels of defocus. The binocular facilitation may be due to the increased cortical activity corresponding to the fovea.

Keywords: visual acuity • binocular vision/stereopsis • pattern vision 

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.