April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Efficacy of Presbyopic Corneal Ablation With Central-Saving technique : 12-Months Follow-Up
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D. Oh
    Department of Ophthalmology, Chung-Ang University Yong-san Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Y. Chun
    Department of Ophthalmology, Chung-Ang University Yong-San Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • J. Kim
    Department of Ophthalmology, Chung-Ang University Yong-San Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D. Oh, None; Y. Chun, None; J. Kim, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 3938. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D. Oh, Y. Chun, J. Kim; Efficacy of Presbyopic Corneal Ablation With Central-Saving technique : 12-Months Follow-Up. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):3938.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the efficacy, wound healing rate, and refractive changes after the excimer laser with Central-saving technique(CST) for presbyopic correction.

Methods: : This study was designed as prospective, comparative study. Ten eyes of 6 patients with emmetropia (mean spherical equivalent: 0.78±0.25D) had aspheric corneal ablation with preserving central cornea (3.6 ~ 4.0 mm diameter, CST group). Thirteen eyes of 7 patients with emmetropia were underwent the conventional presbyopic eximer laser (non central-saving technique: NCST group). Wound healing rate, uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity, manifested refraction, and corneal topography were compared before the surgery and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the surgery.

Results: : Wound healing time were 1.2±0.3days in CST group, whereas 4.5±2.1days in NCST group. The achieved time of effective near and distance visual acuity (logMAR 0.3 and 0.1) was each 1.2±0.4days and 2.3±1.5days in CST group, whereas each 2.3±1.2days and 5.2±2.1days in NCST group. At postoperative 12months, near and distance uncorrected visual acuity was each logMAR0.009±0.12 and logMAR0.14±0.16 in CST group. Corneal topography showed better maitained central steepness and prolaticity in CST group than NCST group.

Conclusions: : Corneal ablation with CST for presbyopic correction can be effectively used for emmetropia patient by faster wound healing, visual recovery and long-lasting effective maintenance of refractive far and near visual acuity.

Keywords: presbyopia • refractive surgery • refractive surgery: comparative studies 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×