April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Impact of Positive and Negative Defocus on Visual Acuity
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • B. Vasudevan, IV
    Vision Science,
    Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • A. Bradley
    Vision Science,
    Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • L. N. Thibos
    Optometry,
    Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • J. Martin
    School of Optometry,
    Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • J. Nam
    Vision Science,
    Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • N. L. Himebaugh
    School of Optometry,
    Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  B. Vasudevan, IV, Essilor Corporation, F; A. Bradley, Essilor Corporation, F; L.N. Thibos, Essilor Corporation, F; J. Martin, Essilor Corporation, F; J. Nam, Essilor Corporation, F; N.L. Himebaugh, Essilor Corporation, F.
  • Footnotes
    Support  Essilor Corporation
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 3955. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      B. Vasudevan, IV, A. Bradley, L. N. Thibos, J. Martin, J. Nam, N. L. Himebaugh; Impact of Positive and Negative Defocus on Visual Acuity. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):3955.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Because of the profound differences in the retinal images generated by positive and defocused in an aberrated eye, we examined the visual impact of both types of defocus.

Methods: : Twenty subject eyes participated in the study. All the subjects were cyclopleged with 1% cyclopentolate in right eye only, and aberrations were measured using COAS at 630nm. Forced choice staircase methods were used to measure letter acuity after subjective refraction. Defocus was controlled by inserting ophthalmic lenses in front of a 3 or 6 mm artificial pupil that was imaged into the eye’s pupil plane using a unit magnification telescope. Single letters and 3X3 clusters of letters were presented for 1 second, subjects used a keyboard to identify the (central) letter.

Results: : In most eyes, positive defocus produced a fairly linear increase in logMAR (mean slope = 0.5 logMAR/Diopter), but significant non-linear effects contributed to shallower slopes (mean slope = -0.32 logMAR/Diopter) with negative defocus when testing with single letters. Between -1 and -2 diopters, many subjects showed a dramatic decline in the effect of increased negative defocus, and in some cases single letter VA actually improved with increasing defocus. Within this dioptric range, many observers report performing the acuity task by simply reading one of the doubled images observed. Image doubling is consistent with computed images for these eyes based upon measured higher order aberrations and negative defocus. The different impact of positive and negative defocus on acuity was greatly reduced when using the 3X3 letter clusters. With this stimulus, the doubled target images were spatially superimposed with doubled images from the surrounding characters.

Discussion: : Our results indicate that, in eyes with positive spherical aberration, negative defocus can generate multiple or double images. This doubling was particularly detrimental to VA when using clusters of characters such as found in text. The loss of visual performance associated with positive and negative defocus may, therefore, be attributed to quite different types of image degradation, and thus the vision loss experienced by myopes and presbyopes/hyperopes is likely to be qualitatively different.

Keywords: refraction • aberrations • visual acuity 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×