April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Spherical Aberration and Contrast Sensitivity After Custom Surgeries
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J. Barreto, Jr.
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • R. Garcia
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • M. V. Netto
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • S. J. Bechara
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • M. R. Alves
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J. Barreto, Jr., None; R. Garcia, None; M.V. Netto, None; S.J. Bechara, None; M.R. Alves, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  FAPESP (07/50516-2)
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 3969. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J. Barreto, Jr., R. Garcia, M. V. Netto, S. J. Bechara, M. R. Alves; Spherical Aberration and Contrast Sensitivity After Custom Surgeries. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):3969.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To compare spherical aberration (SA) and contrast sensitivity after custom surgeries for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction.

Methods: : Chart review of 70 eyes (35 patients) submitted to wavefront-guided LASIK (WFG-LASIK) and wavefront-guided PRK (WFG-PRK) with myopia up to 5D and astigmatism up to 1,5D. Wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity were performed preoperatively and at one, three, six and twelve months postoperatively.

Results: : The mean pre-treatment SA was 0,13±0.07µm in the WFG-LASIK group and 0,12±0.08µm in the WFG-PRK group (p = 0,344). In the WFG-LASIK group, the mean SA was 0,19±0,10µm (induction of 1,46) after 12 months postoperatively, and in the WFG-PRK group, 0,17±0,11 µm (induction of 1,41) (p = 0,089). Photopic contrast sensitivity improved significantly for most frequencies for both techniques. No significant improvement was found for most mesopic contrast sensitivity frequencies for both groups.

Conclusions: : Despite SA induction, photopic contrast sensitivity has improved after WFG-LASIK and WFG-PRK without significant difference between them. Changes in low levels of SA RMS wavefront error poorly predict visual performance.

Keywords: contrast sensitivity • refractive surgery • refractive surgery: optical quality 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×