April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Quality of Life in Glaucoma Patients: Comparision Between Public Health System and Private Practice
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D. P. Pinheiro
    Ophthalmology, Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • M. G. Rosa
    Ophthalmology, Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • H. P. Solari
    Ophthalmology, Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • J. Lomelino
    Ophthalmology, Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • P. E. R. Knopp
    Ophthalmology, Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • M. P. Ventura
    Ophthalmology, Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 3993. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D. P. Pinheiro, M. G. Rosa, H. P. Solari, J. Lomelino, P. E. R. Knopp, M. P. Ventura; Quality of Life in Glaucoma Patients: Comparision Between Public Health System and Private Practice. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):3993.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the quality of life of glaucoma patients comparing public health system, and private practice, through the questionnaire National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ).

Methods: : A cross-sectional study, developed through the application of NEI-VFQ questionnaire in 83 non-consecutive glaucoma patients at different stages of the disease, 51 from public health system, and 32 patients from private clinic.

Results: : Statistically significant difference between groups was demonstrated in subdomains related to the "general health", "general vision", "ocular pain", "near activities", "distance activities", "mental health" and "role difficulties" no significant difference was demonstrated in "social functioning", "dependency", "driving", "color vision" and "peripheral vision". Regarding the overall score given by the questionnaire statistical difference was observed with an average of 73.13 in the public institutions and 86.07 in the private practice.

Conclusions: : The impact on quality of life was higher in patients from the public institution when compared to those of the private practice through the NEI-VFQ questionnaire.

Keywords: quality of life 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×