April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Comparing Computerized Matched FlickerTM Software With Stereo Disc Viewing to Detect Glaucoma Progression
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Z. Lukowski
    Ophthalmology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
  • M. Razeghinejad
    Ophthalmology, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • M. F. Smith
    Ophthalmology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
  • J. S. Myers
    Ophthalmology, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • R. J. Noecker
    UPMC Eye Center, Eye and Ear Institute, Ophthalmology and Visual Science Research Center, Dept. Ophthalmology, U. Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • G. Wollstein
    UPMC Eye Center, Eye and Ear Institute, Ophthalmology and Visual Science Research Center, Dept. Ophthalmology, U. Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • M. J. Pro
    Ophthalmology, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • L. J. Katz
    Ophthalmology, Wills Eye Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • J. S. Schuman
    UPMC Eye Center, Eye and Ear Institute, Ophthalmology and Visual Science Research Center, Dept. Ophthalmology, U. Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Dept. Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, U. Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • M. B. Sherwood
    Ophthalmology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Z. Lukowski, None; M. Razeghinejad, None; M.F. Smith, None; J.S. Myers, None; R.J. Noecker, None; G. Wollstein, Carl Zeiss Meditec, F; Optovue, F; Bioptigen, P; M.J. Pro, None; L.J. Katz, None; J.S. Schuman, Bioptigen, P; Carl Zeiss Meditec, P; Carl Zeiss Meditec, R; Heidelberg Engineering, R; Pfizer, R; M.B. Sherwood, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  EyeIC, inc. sponsored this study.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 4014. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Z. Lukowski, M. Razeghinejad, M. F. Smith, J. S. Myers, R. J. Noecker, G. Wollstein, M. J. Pro, L. J. Katz, J. S. Schuman, M. B. Sherwood; Comparing Computerized Matched FlickerTM Software With Stereo Disc Viewing to Detect Glaucoma Progression. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):4014.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To compare expert and non-expert optic nerve head (ONH) photograph assessment with and without computerized alignment and presentation software (Matched FlickerTM, EyeIC, Inc., Narberth, PA).

Methods: : This multicenter study involved glaucoma experts and non-experts at University of Florida, Wills Eye Institute, and University of Pittsburgh. Nine fellowship-trained glaucoma specialists and 9 general or in-training ophthalmologists each evaluated fundus photographs of 40-50 eyes by 2 different methods. Two ONH photographs of the same eye were captured at an average interval of three years. The first evaluation was done using the conventional photographic viewing and the second evaluation used Matched FlickerTM alignment and presentation software. The ONH photos were assessed for disc rim thinning, hemorrhage, vessel movement on and off the disc, peripapillary atrophy change, and nerve fiber layer loss. The total evaluation time for each participant was measured. Change or stability was defined as agreement by 2 out of 3 glaucoma specialists or non-expert evaluators.

Results: : The glaucoma experts agreed 81% of the time between stereo viewing and Matched FlickerTM and the residents 75% of the time. Non-glaucoma evaluator viewing time averaged 68 minutes per 40 slides with conventional ONH photo viewing versus 55 minutes with Matched FlickerTM, and glaucoma specialists spent 45 minutes and 37 minutes respectively; however, conventional viewing always preceded Matched FlickerTM. When comparing the responses for conventional viewing between experts and non-experts, there was 85% agreement. When comparing responses for Flicker viewing between experts and non-experts, there was 75% agreement.

Conclusions: : Matched FlickerTM deserves further investigation as a tool for detecting changes in ONH photographs and glaucoma progression.

Keywords: imaging/image analysis: clinical • optic disc • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×