April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Efficacy of Treatment Options for Anisometropic Amblyopia
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • J. Ho
    New England College of Optometry, Boston, Massachusetts
  • M. Luu
    New England College of Optometry, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Y. Pang
    Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  J. Ho, None; M. Luu, None; Y. Pang, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 4346. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      J. Ho, M. Luu, Y. Pang; Efficacy of Treatment Options for Anisometropic Amblyopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):4346.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : It is unclear whether the addition of vision therapy to amblyopia treatment contributes to the acuity improvement of the amblyopic eye. The purpose of this study is to compare the treatment outcomes of different treatment modalities on anisometropic amblyopia, including optical correction (OC), patching (PC), and patching plus vision therapy (PVT).

Methods: : Charts of 725 amblyopic patients were reviewed. Only patients without previous amblyopia treatment and spectacle correction were eligible. Treatment was considered completed when the acuity in the amblyopic eye was stable on 3 consecutive visits. Forty subjects met the study’s criteria, with 6, 11, and 23 subjects in the treatment groups of OC, PC, and PVT, respectively. Data collected included the subjects’ age, gender, race, baseline visual acuity (BVA), anisometropia, and final VA (FVA) at the end of amblyopia treatment. VA improvement (VAI) of the amblyopic eye was calculated. Analysis of covariance (ACOVA) was performed to compare the treatment outcomes among groups of OC, PC, and PVT while controlling age, gender, race, and the degree of anisometropia.

Results: : The mean (±SD) age of subjects was 8.21±3.32 years old. The mean BVA (±SD) in the amblyopic eye was 0.67±0.30 logMAR, with 0.48±0.10, 0.64±0.35, 0.73±0.30 logMAR in the OC, PC, and PVT groups, respectively, with no statistical difference in BVA among 3 groups. The mean FVA in the amblyopic eye was 0.31±0.25 logMAR, with 0.17±0.10, 0.34±0.35, 0.33±0.22 logMAR in each of the groups, respectively. The mean VAI was 0.36±0.19 logMAR among all groups, with an average of 0.31±0.13, 0.30±0.15, and 0.40±0.22 logMAR in the each of the groups, respectively. Each treatment group significantly improved acuity in the amblyopic eye (OC: P=0.002, PC: P<0.001, PVT: P<0.001). However, there were no statistical difference in the either FVA or VAI among three treatment group while controlling age, gender, race, and the degree of anisometropia.

Conclusions: : Although each treatment effectively improved VA in the amblyopic eye, no statistical difference was identified among the treatment groups. Further study is needed to test whether vision therapy impacts other vision functions, such as accommodation, in amblyopic patients.

Keywords: amblyopia • visual acuity 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×