April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Retinal Screening in Pediatric Patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Y. Haeussler-Sinangin
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
  • H. Swyter
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
  • M. Koss
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
  • P. Singh
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
  • S. Scholtz
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
  • F. Koch
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Y. Haeussler-Sinangin, None; H. Swyter, None; M. Koss, None; P. Singh, None; S. Scholtz, None; F. Koch, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 4366. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Y. Haeussler-Sinangin, H. Swyter, M. Koss, P. Singh, S. Scholtz, F. Koch; Retinal Screening in Pediatric Patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):4366.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract
 
Purpose:
 

Retinal screening has proven effective in reducing or preventingvisual loss from sight-threatening posterior segment eye disease.Diagnostically conclusive retinal imaging relies to a considerableextent upon the adequate positioning of the patient. It is desirableto detect posterior segment pathologies at an early stage oflife. The objective is to photograph anatomic structures ofthe posterior eye segment with enough detail to make diagnosticdecisions.

 
Methods:
 

A total of 528 children were examined. Three different non-mydriaticfundus cameras (Nidek, HRC, Eyescan) were compared with regardto their practicality and reliability of image analysis.

 
Results:
 

The duration of examination per subject ranged from 3.8 minutesto 7.5 minutes. Hand-held devices were unexpectedly hard tohandle, so these measurements were discontinued. A chin restwas used where possible.

 
Conclusions:
 

In pediatric patients, fast image acquisition is often necessary.Therefore, non-mydriatic measurements proved to be suitablefor children. The non-flash camera was tolerated better in general.To optimize adequate patient positioning, support elements asin self- tonometry are conceivable.  

  

 
Keywords: retina • imaging/image analysis: clinical • retinal development 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×