April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Reproducibility of Retinal Thickness Measurements on Normal and Pathologic Eyes Using Different Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. Giani
    Retina Service - Dept of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary - HMS, Boston, Massachusetts
  • M. V. Cigada
    Ophthalmology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
  • N. Choudhry
    Retina Service - Dept of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary - HMS, Boston, Massachusetts
  • A. Peroglio Deiro
    Dept of Clinical Science (Luigi Sacco), University of Milan, Milano, Italy
  • M. Oldani
    Dept of Clinical Science (Luigi Sacco), University of Milan, Milano, Italy
  • M. Pellegrini
    Dept of Clinical Science (Luigi Sacco), University of Milan, Milano, Italy
  • A. Invernizzi
    Dept of Clinical Science (Luigi Sacco), University of Milan, Milano, Italy
  • P. G. Duca
    Unità di Satistica Medica e Biometria, University of Milan - Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • J. W. Miller
    Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • G. Staurenghi
    Dept of Clinical Science (Luigi Sacco), University of Milan, Milano, Italy
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A. Giani, None; M.V. Cigada, None; N. Choudhry, None; A. Peroglio Deiro, None; M. Oldani, None; M. Pellegrini, None; A. Invernizzi, None; P.G. Duca, None; J.W. Miller, None; G. Staurenghi, Heidelberg Engineering, C.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 4396. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. Giani, M. V. Cigada, N. Choudhry, A. Peroglio Deiro, M. Oldani, M. Pellegrini, A. Invernizzi, P. G. Duca, J. W. Miller, G. Staurenghi; Reproducibility of Retinal Thickness Measurements on Normal and Pathologic Eyes Using Different Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):4396.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To compare retinal thickness measurements produced by different time-domain and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT and SD-OCT) devices when imaging normal and pathologic eyes

Methods: : 110 eyes were imaged by six different OCT devices: Stratus from Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, CA, USA (software version 4.0.2), Cirrus from Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, CA, USA (Software version 2.0.0.54), Spectralis HRA+OCT from Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany (Software version 3.1.4), RTVue-100 from Optovue Inc., Fremont, CA, USA (Software Version 2.5), SDOCT Copernicus HR from Optopol Technology S.A., Zawiercie, Poland (Software version 2.01) and 3D OCT-1000 from Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan (Software version 2.12). Eyes were normal of affected by different retina pathologies, including exudative and non-exudative age related macular degeneration, epiretinal membrane, cystoid macular edema, macular hole, branch retinal vein occlusion, Stargardt’s disease and central serous chorioretinopathy. For each instrument we used standard analysis protocols for macular thickness evaluation. Mean retinal thickness values between the instruments in central and mid peripheral areas were compared

Results: : The 6 different devices produced measurements that differ in variance (Bartlett test p=0.006), and mean values (Friedman test p<0.001). Altman-Bland analysis revealed that the limits of agreement (LOA) for all the comparisons were not acceptable. Regression was calculated comparing all the instruments and it was elaborated into a conversion table, despite a high standard error for both intercepts and slopes conversion values

Conclusions: : This study suggests that retinal thickness measurements obtained with various OCT devices are different beyond clinical practice tolerance, according to Altman-Bland analysis. Furthermore, regression analysis reveals very high standard error values. These differences in retinal thickness measurements among the instruments appear to be primarily due to the analysis algorithms used to set retinal inner and outer boundaries

Keywords: imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • imaging/image analysis: clinical • macula/fovea 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×