April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Evaluation of the Reproducibility and Agreement of Optical Coherence Tomography Images for Patients With Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. H. Rashid
    Ophthalmology, Retinal Imaging Research and Reading Center, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  • R. Channa
    Ophthalmology, Retinal Imaging Research and Reading Center, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  • M. Shulman
    Ophthalmology, Retinal Imaging Research and Reading Center, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  • E. Hatef
    Ophthalmology, Retinal Imaging Research and Reading Center, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  • J. Talmud
    Ophthalmology, Retinal Imaging Research and Reading Center, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  • M. Ibrahim
    Ophthalmology, Retinal Imaging Research and Reading Center, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Z. Rentiya
    Ophthalmology, Retinal Imaging Research and Reading Center, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  • A. Khwaja
    Ophthalmology, Retinal Imaging Research and Reading Center, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  • D. Do
    Ophthalmology, Retinal Imaging Research and Reading Center, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Q. Nguyen
    Ophthalmology, Retinal Imaging Research and Reading Center, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A.H. Rashid, None; R. Channa, None; M. Shulman, None; E. Hatef, None; J. Talmud, None; M. Ibrahim, None; Z. Rentiya, None; A. Khwaja, None; D. Do, Heidelberg Engineering, F; Q. Nguyen, Heidelberg Engineering, F.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 4397. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. H. Rashid, R. Channa, M. Shulman, E. Hatef, J. Talmud, M. Ibrahim, Z. Rentiya, A. Khwaja, D. Do, Q. Nguyen; Evaluation of the Reproducibility and Agreement of Optical Coherence Tomography Images for Patients With Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):4397.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is currently employed to evaluate neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD). We compare intra-observer reproducibility and agreement for two Spectral-domain (SD) and one Time-domain (TD) OCT devices in patients with NVAMD. Thickness measurements before and after correction of boundaries on SpectralisTM images were also compared.

Methods: : 42 eyes with NVAMD were scanned using SpectralisTM and CirrusTM SD-OCT, and StratusTM TD-OCT. The same operator scanned each eye twice on the three devices. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for reproducibility; Bland-Altman (BA) plots helped determine agreement among machines. For SpectralisTM images, automated algorithms were manually corrected to follow the inner and outer boundaries. A paired t-test was used to compare the retinal thickness before and after correction. The percentage of images with a thickness difference of >48µm in the central 1mm diameter before and after correction was determined.

Results: : ICCs were greater than 0.95 for all three machines. Mean central 1mm foveal thickness in µm (+SD) was 239.53 + 82.63, 350.53 + 122.67, and 291.79 + 149.35 for StratusTM, SpectralisTM, and CirrusTM, respectively. BA plots gave a mean difference in µm (95% CI interval) of 43.3 (-52.6, 139.2), -50.3µm (-288.2, 187.3), and 94.8 (-30.9, 220.5) for CirrusTM vs. StratusTM, CirrusTM vs. SpectralisTM, and SpectralisTM vs. StratusTM, respectively. Thickness measurements before and after correction of boundaries were significantly different for all except the outer temporal subfield (p<0.05). 27.5% of the images of SpectralisTM had a difference of >48µm in thickness in the central 1mm sub-field after correction.

Conclusions: : Statistically significant differences in thickness measurements before and after correction of boundaries on SpectralisTM images suggest that manual correction for accuracy is necessary. However, more than 70% of thickness differences were below 48µm, suggesting that differences may be within the clinically accepted variability of the device. ICC values indicate that readings are reliable when scanning a patient on the same machine, but large BA plot confidence intervals show that values from different machines do not agree well. We conclude that the same device gives reliable readings for a patient with NVAMD, but different machines may give very different thickness measurements.

Keywords: imaging/image analysis: clinical • imaging methods (CT, FA, ICG, MRI, OCT, RTA, SLO, ultrasound) • age-related macular degeneration 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×