April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Induced Keratometrical Change After Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery Combined With Trabeculectomy or Ahmed Valve
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • R. Leal Rodriguez, Sr.
    Ophthalmology, Asociacion Para Evitar la Ceguera, Coyoacan, Mexico
  • O. Albis Donado, Sr.
    Ophthalmology, Asociacion Para Evitar la Ceguera, Coyoacan, Mexico
  • F. Gil Carrasco, Sr.
    Ophthalmology, Asociacion Para Evitar la Ceguera, Coyoacan, Mexico
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  R. Leal Rodriguez, Sr., None; O. Albis Donado, Sr., None; F. Gil Carrasco, Sr., None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 4453. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      R. Leal Rodriguez, Sr., O. Albis Donado, Sr., F. Gil Carrasco, Sr.; Induced Keratometrical Change After Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery Combined With Trabeculectomy or Ahmed Valve. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):4453.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To assess the surgical induced astigmatism (SIA) in glaucoma patients at 6 and 12 months after phacoemulsification combined with trabeculectomy or Ahmed Valve

Methods: : We conducted a study where 203 eyes from 163 patients were studied retrospectively. One hundred fifty nine eyes underwent phacoemulsification plus trabeculectomy (group 1), 44 patients underwent phacoemulsification plus Ahmed Valve (group 2). Keratometrical readings before surgery and at 6 and 12 months were recorded. SIA was analyzed using both arithmetic and vector analysis methods, statistical differences were compared using student's T and ANOVA

Results: : Basal mean astigmatism was 1.0 and 1.06 for group 1 and 2 respectively. SIA analyzed by arithmetic method was 1.5 D and 0.9 D at 6 and 12 months for group 1, and 2 D and 1.5 D at 6 and 12 months for group 2. We found a significant difference in SIA between 4 and 12 months in group 1 (p=0.003) but we didn't find significant difference in SIA between 4 and 12 months in group 2 (p=0.663). The SIA decreased at 12 months for group 1 but remained larger than basal at 12 months for group 2. Comparing SIA between groups we found significant difference at 12 months (p=0.002) SIA analyzed by the vector method did not show statistical difference between both groups

Conclusions: : Even though there is a statistical difference in arithmetic keratometric analyze between groups, the vector analysis shows no statistical difference

Keywords: refractive error development • cataract • astigmatism 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×