April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Evaluation of Computer Based Primary Visual Cortex Training After Aspheric Monofocal, Multifocal, and Accommodating IOL Implantation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • G. O. Waring IV
    Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
  • J. D. Hunkeler
    Ophthalmology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Prairie Village, Kansas
  • R. L. Lindstrom
    Ophthalmology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  G.O. Waring IV, RevitalVision, C; J.D. Hunkeler, RevitalVision, I; R.L. Lindstrom, RevitalVision, I.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 4575. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      G. O. Waring IV, J. D. Hunkeler, R. L. Lindstrom; Evaluation of Computer Based Primary Visual Cortex Training After Aspheric Monofocal, Multifocal, and Accommodating IOL Implantation. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):4575.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the efficacy of computer based primary Cortex Vision Training (CVT) in improving vision after aspheric monofocal, multifocal and accommodative Intraocular Lens (IOL) implantation.

Methods: : A prospective, multicenter study investigating efficacy of CVT after implantation of 5 different IOL styles including aspheric monofocal, multifocal and accommodative IOLs in 60 eyes. Uncorrected EDTRS distance visual acuity (UCDVA), near (UCNVA), distance and near contrast sensitivity function (CSF) was tested one month and three months after IOL implantation. Subjects were administered twenty sessions of CVT during the intervening two months. One month and three month data were compared.

Results: : Mean age of all subjects was 68 years. After CVT, mean improvement in UCDVA and UCNVA for the entire group was 1.3 and 1.0 lines, and mean improvement in distance and near CSF were 223% and 197% respectively. After CVT, mean improvement in UCDVA and UCNVA for the Crystalens accommodative IOL (N=6) was 0.3 and 1.7, Alcon Restor apodized diffractive IOL (N=10) was 1.5 and 1.1, AMO ReZoom zonal refractive IOL (N=24) was 1.4 and 0.7, Alcon Acrysof aspheric monofocal IOL (N=10) was 1.3 and 0.7, and AMO Technis aspheric monofocal IOL (N=10) was 1.4 and 1.3 lines respectively. Additional refractive and CSF data on each lens group will be reported.

Conclusions: : Computer based primary visual cortex training improves uncorrected visual acuity and contrast sensitivity function at both distance and near after aspheric monofocal, multifocal and accommodative intraocular lens implantation.

Keywords: intraocular lens • adaptation: blur • contrast sensitivity 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×