April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Bevacizumab (Avastin®) Differs From Ranibizumab (Lucentis®) in Its Binding Affinity to Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) and Vascular Endothelium Cell Membranes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • T. H. Tezel
    Ophthal & Vis Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
  • Q. Zeng
    Ophthal & Vis Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
  • S. Schaal
    Ophthal & Vis Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
  • H. J. Kaplan
    Ophthal & Vis Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  T.H. Tezel, None; Q. Zeng, None; S. Schaal, None; H.J. Kaplan, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  : Supported (THT) in part by a Career Development Award from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, NYC, NY.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 4955. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      T. H. Tezel, Q. Zeng, S. Schaal, H. J. Kaplan; Bevacizumab (Avastin®) Differs From Ranibizumab (Lucentis®) in Its Binding Affinity to Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) and Vascular Endothelium Cell Membranes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):4955.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To determine and characterize the differences in the binding of bevacizumab and ranibizumab to human RPE and human vascular endothelium cell membranes.

Methods: : The expression of VEGF and the receptor for Fc (FcR), on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC), ARPE-19 and primary human RPE (phRPE) cell membranes was determined under normoxic (21% O2) and hypoxic (10% O2/10 nM, PMA for 12 hours) conditions using Western blotting and immunohistochemistry. Effect of bevacizumab (625 µg/ml) and ranibizumab (125 µg/ml) on cell viability and complement activation was determined with FACS analysis. Confocal microscopy and iC3b ELISA was used to confirm the results. VEGF-expressing SKOV cells were used as a positive control.

Results: : phRPE, ARPE-19 and HUVECs express VEGF on cell membrane; however Fc expression was observed only on phRPE and HUVEC. Hypoxia increases membrane-bound VEGF expression in HUVEC (2.3±0.6x) and RPE (2.6±0.4x) cells, but FcR expression remained unchanged. Bevacizumab was able to bind to HUVEC and RPE cell membranes resulting in RPE cell death (3.8%), whereas ranibizumab bound weakly on RPE without causing cell death. Bevacizumab binding to HUVEC cells was completely blocked by FcR-antibodies indicating that its binding is mediated through Fc-FcR interaction. Additionally, bevacizumab binding to RPE cells increased in hypoxia along with an increase in membrane-bound VEGF expression.

Conclusions: : Bevacizumab binds to different ligands on HUVEC (FcR) and human RPE (membrane-bound VEGF) cells. Binding of bevacizumab is associated with complement activation and cell death. In contrast, Ranibizumab can only weakly bind to RPE and does not activate complement

Keywords: age-related macular degeneration • receptors: pharmacology/physiology • retinal pigment epithelium 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×