April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Evaluation of the Biocompatibility of Two Biodegradable Ocular Microfilms in Rabbit Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. Ang
    Singapore National Eye Center/ Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
  • P. Yan
    Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
  • J. S. Mehta
    Singapore National Eye Center/ Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
    Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
  • M. Zhen
    Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
  • S. Yu
    Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
  • S. S. Venkatraman
    Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
  • T. T. Wong
    Singapore National Eye Center/ Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
    Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine (National University of Singapore), Singapore, Singapore
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M. Ang, None; P. Yan, None; J.S. Mehta, None; M. Zhen, None; S. Yu, None; S.S. Venkatraman, None; T.T. Wong, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NMRC/TCR/002-SERI/2008
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 5321. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. Ang, P. Yan, J. S. Mehta, M. Zhen, S. Yu, S. S. Venkatraman, T. T. Wong; Evaluation of the Biocompatibility of Two Biodegradable Ocular Microfilms in Rabbit Eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):5321.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To study the biocompatibility and degradation of two different compositions of biodegradable microfilms in the rabbit.

Methods: : Two types of biodegradable microfilms were cast from either poly (d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) 53/47 or poly (d, l-lactide-co-caprolactone) (PLC) 70/30. Each film was sized at 0.5 x 5.0 x 10.0 mm. 18 eyes (9 rabbits) were surgically implanted with one type of microfilm in each eye. The implant was inserted in the subconjunctival space and sutured with 10/0 nylon. The eyes were regularly assessed for clinical signs of inflammation or implant-related complications with slit-lamp photography and anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Rabbits were sacrificed at 1, 3 and 6 months (n=3) and the eyes were histologically analyzed for sign of inflammation, foreign body reaction and implant encapsulation.

Results: : All PLGA53/47 (n=9) and PLC70/30 (n=9) microfilms remained within the subconjunctival space with no evidence of implant migration or erosion through the conjunctiva over the 6 months. Clinical assessment showed both microfilms to degrade gradually. PLGA53/47 microfilms were softer and more gel-like in consistency compared to PLC70/30, and degraded at a faster rate. The mean degradation rate for the PLGA53/47 microfilms was 1.47 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-2.35) while that of PLC70/30 microfilm was 1.28 (95% CI 0.72-1.85). All the implanted PLGA54/37 microfilms had completely degraded by 4 months. In contrast, PLC7030 microfilms remained visible even at 6 months. Minimal conjunctival inflammation and vascularisation were clinically observed during the study period, even after the onset of degradation of both the microfilms. Implant encapsulation was observed with only PLGA70/30.

Conclusions: : Biodegradable microfilms composed of PLGA53/47 and PLC70/30 are non-toxic and well tolerated for potential use as ocular drug delivery platforms via the subconjunctival route. PLGA53/47 degraded at a faster rate than PLC70/30. These properties may be used to vary the duration of drug delivery in the eye.

Keywords: drug toxicity/drug effects 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×