April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Clinical Comparison of Ciliary Sulcus or Ciliary Body Localization in Transcleral Fixation of Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • D. Ma
    Department of ophthalmology,
    Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Seoul Artificial Eye Center, Seoul National University Hospital Clinical Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • M. Kim
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Seoul Artificial Eye Center, Seoul National University Hospital Clinical Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • W. Wee
    Department of Ophthalmology,
    Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Seoul Artificial Eye Center, Seoul National University Hospital Clinical Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • J. Lee
    Seoul Artificial Eye Center, Seoul National University Hospital Clinical Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Department of ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bun Dang, Republic of Korea
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  D. Ma, None; M. Kim, None; W. Wee, None; J. Lee, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 5399. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      D. Ma, M. Kim, W. Wee, J. Lee; Clinical Comparison of Ciliary Sulcus or Ciliary Body Localization in Transcleral Fixation of Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):5399.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To compare clinical outcome of ciliary sulcus or ciliary body localization in transcleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lens (PIOL)

Methods: : Retrospective review of 65 patient' eyes were divided into 2 groups based on the ciliary sulcus (Group 1, G1:1mm away from the limbus, N=37) or ciliary body localization(Group 2, G2; 3mm apart from the limbus, N=28) in transcleral fixation of PIOL. Visual and refractive outcomes, biometric changes, and complications including retinal detatchment, dislocation or tilt of PIOL, iris capture of PIOL were compared between two groups in the mean follow-up of 29 months.

Results: : Iris capture or dislocation of PIOL in G1 (14.3%, 20%) was more frequent than in G2(0%, 4.2%), which did not show a statistical significance. There is no difference in postoperative vitreous hemorrhage. G1 showed more diminished endothelial cell density or increased intraocular pressure than G2, which was insignificant. There is no difference of best-corrected visual acuity between two groups. Discrepancy of final refractive error from the target refractive error was -0.88 and -0.57 diopter in G1 and G2, respectively

Conclusions: : Ciliary body localization in transcleral fixation of PIOL tend to be a safe and effective procedure as an alternative option compared with ciliary sulcus localization.

Keywords: cataract 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×