April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Diagnostic Power and Reproducibility of Multifocal Pupillographic Perimetry in Glaucoma
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • T. Maddess
    ARC CoE Vision Science, CVS,
    Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
  • C. F. Carle
    ARC CoE Vision Science, CVS,
    Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
  • M. Kolic
    ARC CoE Vision Science, CVS,
    Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
  • R. W. Essex
    Ophthalmology, The Canberra Hosptial,
    Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
  • A. C. James
    ARC CoE Vision Science, CVS,
    Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  T. Maddess, Seeing Machines, F; Seeing Machines, I; Seeing Machines, C; Seeing Machines, P; C.F. Carle, Seeing Machines, F; M. Kolic, Seeing Machines, F; R.W. Essex, None; A.C. James, Seeing Machines, F; Seeing Machines, I; Seeing Machines, C; Seeing Machines, P.
  • Footnotes
    Support  ARC Grant CE0561903
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 5505. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      T. Maddess, C. F. Carle, M. Kolic, R. W. Essex, A. C. James; Diagnostic Power and Reproducibility of Multifocal Pupillographic Perimetry in Glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):5505.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : We examined 3 variants of multifocal pupillographic perimetry in glaucoma to investigate the effects of stimulus colour, and delivery rate upon diagnostic power and test-retest variability.

Methods: : We tested both visual fields of 73 normal and 49 glaucoma age matched subjects. All subjects gave informed written consent. Testing was repeated about 2 weeks apart yielding 488 visual fields. All eyes were examined with Stratus OCT, HFA achromatic and Matrix 24-2 perimetry. Visual fields were classified by HFA mean defects: moderate: 6 to 12 dB, severe: >12 dB. Multifocal stimuli having 44 test regions/eye, extending to 30 deg eccentricity, were presented concurrently to both eyes using a prototype of the FDA cleared TrueField Analyser. Recording duration was 6 minutes, divided into 9 segments of 40 s. Data from blinks and fixation losses was automatically removed and a 40 s segment only needed to be repeated if more that 15% of the data from that segment was lost. The 3 stimulus protocols examined differed in terms of mean presentation intervals (MPI) of 1 or 4 s per region. The stimuli were either yellow on a dim yellow background, or green presented on a dim red background. The peak test luminances were 150 cd/m2, backgrounds 10 cd/m2. The 3 stimulus types employed a luminance balancing strategy designed to make pupil response amplitudes more even across the visual field [ARVO 2009, E-Abstract 5281]. Diagnostic performance was assessed by areas under ROC curves (AUCs). Test-retest variability was examined with correlation coefficients derived from Bland-Altman plots.

Results: : The yellow MPI 4 s stimulus performed best diagnostically providing an AUC of 0.981 for severe fields. The median signal to noise ratio of the peak pupil response expressed as a t-statistic for that protocol and normal subjects was 2.88 ± 0.36 (mean ± SD), 2.96 ± 0.47 for patients. In glaucoma patients the correlation coefficient for the two repeats was 0.72.

Conclusions: : Good diagnostic power, reproducibility and signal to noise ratios were obtained with a test duration of 3 min/eye. Also separate information on afferent and efferent defects is obtained at every point in the field, as is response delay.

Keywords: perimetry • pupil • visual fields 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×