April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
Clinical Outcomes of Secondary Iol Implantation in Aphakic Vitrectomized Eyes
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. Li
    Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
  • J. E. Lee
    Ophthalmology, Pusan National Univ Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
  • H. Choi
    Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
  • H. Park
    Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
  • J. Jung
    Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M. Li, None; J.E. Lee, None; H. Choi, None; H. Park, None; J. Jung, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 5739. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. Li, J. E. Lee, H. Choi, H. Park, J. Jung; Clinical Outcomes of Secondary Iol Implantation in Aphakic Vitrectomized Eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):5739.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Vitrectomized eyes are challenging to implant intraocular lens (IOL) secondarily. The clinical outcomes of IOL implantation in aphakic vitrectomized eyes were evaluated

Methods: : Medical records of 43 patients who had transscleral fixation of an IOL in the aphakic and vitrectomized eye were reviewed retrospectively. To maintain intraocular pressure during the operation, a cannula was placed at the pars plana infusing balanced salt solution. The IOL was inserted through the sclera tunnel incision, and the haptics were fixed by suturing at the ciliary sulcus. Pre- and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and difference between target and postoperative refractive error were analyzed

Results: : Mean age of the patients was 45.6 years. Mean follow-up was 11.9 ± 11.6 months. The underlying vitreoretinal disease were ocular trauma (n=33), rhegmatous retinal detachment (n=3), complicated cataract surgery (n=2), uveitis (n=2), congenital cataract (n=1), acute retinal necrosis (n=1), and secondary glaucoma (n=1). BCVA of logMAR 0.82 at baseline improved to logMAR 0.66 at final visit. Astigmatism was -2.55D preoperatively, and changed into -2.18D, -2.17D, and -1.95D at postoperative 1, 2, and 3 month respectively. Mean postoperative spherical equivalent(SE) was 0.21±5.96D. Mean deviation of final refraction from target refraction was + 0.72±5.90. Postoperative complications included secondary glaucoma (n=1), bullous keratopathy (n=1) and cystoid macular edema (n=1)

Conclusions: : Secondary IOL implantation could be performed safely in aphakic vitrectomized eyes. However, primary underlying disease limited visual recovery

Keywords: refractive surgery: phakic IOL • astigmatism • refraction 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×