April 2010
Volume 51, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   April 2010
One Year Outcomes After Retinal Detachment Surgery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. Day
    Ophthalmology,
    Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
  • D. S. Grossman
    Economics,
    Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
  • F. A. Sloan
    Economics,
    Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
  • P. P. Lee
    Ophthalmology,
    Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S. Day, None; D.S. Grossman, None; F.A. Sloan, None; P.P. Lee, Alcon, Allergan, Pfizer, Genentech, C.
  • Footnotes
    Support  National Institute on Aging grant 2R37-AG-17473-05A1
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science April 2010, Vol.51, 6064. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. Day, D. S. Grossman, F. A. Sloan, P. P. Lee; One Year Outcomes After Retinal Detachment Surgery. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010;51(13):6064.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To determine longitudinal rates of second operation and postoperative adverse outcomes after retinal detachment surgery in a nationally representative sample of older Americans.

Methods: : Using Medicare 5% inpatient, outpatient, Part-B, and durable medical equipment claims files, we identified beneficiaries who were diagnosed with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) between 1991-2007 who underwent primary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), scleral buckle (SB), combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckle (PPV/SB), pneumatic retinopexy (PR), or laser photocoagulation or cryotherapy alone. RRD, PPV, SB, combined PPV/SB, PR, and laser photocoagulation/cryotherapy were ascertained from International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) procedure codes. Rates of second operation and postoperative adverse outcomes were analyzed by cumulative incidence and logistic regression to control for prior adverse outcome measures and demographic factors.

Results: : In a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries between 1991-2007, there were 10,292 beneficiaries who underwent repair of RRD. At 1-year follow-up, the rate of receipt of another operation among Medicare beneficiaries who had undergone primary PR was much higher (40.5%) relative to the PPV (20.9%) and SB (19.2%) groups. PR individuals were more than 3 times as likely, while PPV/SB individuals were 75% more likely, and PPV individuals were 22% more likely to receive another retinal repair procedure compared to laser/cryotherapy individuals. Individuals receiving PPV had the highest rate of adverse outcomes (3.8%), and were nearly 3 times as likely to suffer adverse outcomes than were persons undergoing laser/cryotherapy alone. Results were robust in sensitivity analysis. Rates did not differ by cohort group.

Conclusions: : The rate of second operation was much higher after PR than PPV or SB, and the rate of adverse outcomes was higher in PPV, even after controlling for risk factors and demographic variables.

Keywords: retinal detachment 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×