May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Small Choroidal Melanoma : Inclusion Criteria for a Randomized Trial
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • A. D. Singh
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
  • M. Diener-West
    Departments of Biostatistics and Ophthalmology,
    Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  • S. M. Reynolds
    Ophthalmology,
    Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  • L. Janku
    Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, Ohio
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  A.D. Singh, None; M. Diener-West, None; S.M. Reynolds, None; L. Janku, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  National Eye Institute, National Cancer Institute, Ratner Foundation, Research to Prevent Blindness Challenge Grant
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 33. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      A. D. Singh, M. Diener-West, S. M. Reynolds, L. Janku; Small Choroidal Melanoma : Inclusion Criteria for a Randomized Trial. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):33. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To develop objective inclusion criteria for a randomized clinical trial of prompt treatment vs deferred treatment for small choroidal melanoma.

Methods: : Data from the small melanoma prospective study component of the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study were used for this supplemental analysis. Multivariable analysis of features associated with time to growth was performed in a stratified manner. Growth was defined as an increase from small to either medium or large-sized melanoma. Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to growth to medium or large tumor size were calculated for all subgroups of patients specified by their cumulative number of baseline risk factors (1 through 5); 5-year estimates and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were obtained and compared.

Results: : Forty-four tumors grew during follow-up. Growth was defined as an increase from small to either medium or large-sized melanoma. Various combinations of risk factors were observed in the 188 tumors; any two risk factors were present in 179 tumors (95.2%) and none had all five factors. The risk of growth at 5 years was more than 50% when the tumor was either large (diameter 12.1-16.0 mm) or when orange pigment was present. Tumor thickness (2.0 mm-3.0 mm) by itself was not associated with increased growth rate but appeared to be significant when such tumors were larger in diameter (12.1-16.0 mm) or had orange pigment.

Conclusions: : Since the risk of tumor growth in patients with high risk factors (50% or greater rate of growth by Kaplan-Meier estimate) exceeds the risk of non-growth, it is ethical to randomize such patients into an intervention trial.

Keywords: oncology • melanoma • uvea 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×