May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Comparative Central Corneal Thickness by Ultrasound Pachymetry, Artemis-2, and Visante OCT
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • S. E. Greyrose
    Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
    Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
  • C. E. Starr
    Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
  • H. O. Lloyd
    Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
  • R. H. Silverman
    Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
    Riverside Research Institute, New York, New York
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  S.E. Greyrose, None; C.E. Starr, None; H.O. Lloyd, None; R.H. Silverman, Arcscan, Inc., P.
  • Footnotes
    Support  NIH Grant EB000238 and the Dyson Foundation
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 1020. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      S. E. Greyrose, C. E. Starr, H. O. Lloyd, R. H. Silverman; Comparative Central Corneal Thickness by Ultrasound Pachymetry, Artemis-2, and Visante OCT. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):1020. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To determine reproducibility and compare mean values of central corneal thickness obtained using contact ultrasound pachymetry, the Artemis-2 ultrasound arc-scanner, and Visante Optical Coherence Tomography.

Methods: : The central corneal thickness of 20 eyes (10 healthy subjects) was measured using three different modalities. Three consecutive contact pachymetry values were performed on both eyes and the mean value was recorded. We then performed Visante OCT corneal pachymetry maps on each eye. Lastly, Artemis-2 scans were performed with duplicate corneal maps (generated from six scans, one for each clock-hour). We recorded the minimum central corneal thickness values from the Visante OCT and Artemis-2 maps. We then determined differences in corneal thickness between techniques and standard deviations for repeated measurements of the same eye. We compared the results statistically using ANOVA, correlation analysis, and Bland-Altman plots.

Results: : The standard deviations for multiple measurements of the same eye were 0.7 microns for Artemis-2, 3.2 microns for contact pachymetry, and 2.5 microns for Visante OCT. The mean differences between techniques + SD were 1.9+10.6 microns (Visante OCT-Artemis-2), 25.2+8.4 microns (pachymeter - Artemis-2), and 23.8+8.2 microns (pachymeter - Visante OCT). One way ANOVA showed a significant difference between the three different modalities of measuring central corneal thickness (F=5.39, p=0.007). R2 values for correlations between the methods were: Artermis-2 versus Vistante=0.845, Artemis-2 versus pachymetry=0.867, and Visante versus pachymetry=0.899.

Conclusions: : There was a high degree of agreement between the Visante OCT and Artemis-2 in measurement of central corneal thickness. However, contact ultrasound pachymetry values were on average approximately 24 microns thicker than both the Visante OCT and Artemis-2.

Keywords: cornea: clinical science • refractive surgery • refractive surgery: corneal topography 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×