May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Apodized Diffractive IOL (AcrySof ReSTORE) and Its Effect on FDT MATRIX
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • C. Rolim de Moura
    UNIFESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology,
    Centro Oftalmologico Tranjan, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • J. B. Vita
    UNIFESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Centro Oftalmologico Tranjan, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • C. P. Dal Forno
    UNIFESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology,
    Centro Oftalmologico Tranjan, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • A. Tranjan
    Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology,
    Centro Oftalmologico Tranjan, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  C. Rolim de Moura, None; J.B. Vita, None; C.P. Dal Forno, None; A. Tranjan, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 1068. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      C. Rolim de Moura, J. B. Vita, C. P. Dal Forno, A. Tranjan; Apodized Diffractive IOL (AcrySof ReSTORE) and Its Effect on FDT MATRIX. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):1068. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the effect of apodized diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) (AcrySof ReSTORE) on frequency doubling technology (FDT - Humphrey Matrix) when compared to the same yellow plataform (AcrySof Natural IQ).

Methods: : We selected eyes submitted to uncomplicated facoemulsification and IOL implantation (AcrySof ReSTORE and Natural IQ), by the same surgeon, that stated with at least 20/30 uncorrected visual acuity. Previous eye surgery, other eye disease, elevated IOP and glaucoma suspect eyes because of suspect optic discs were excluded. 24-2 full threshold strategy FDT perimetry (Matrix) was performed three months after cataract surgery. Patients were previously trained (30 minutes before the full exam) with the screening Matrix program. We analyzed mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) between the two groups, using the t test corrected for interocular correlation.

Results: : There were 37 eyes of 22 subjects, 17 eyes received the AcrySof ReSTORE IOL and 20 eyes received the AcrySof Natural IQ. They were 15 women and 7 men and their age varied from 41 to 81 years old. Pupillary diameter was similar in both groups (P=.20). Comparing the group that received AcrySof ReSTORE and AcrySof Natural IQ, there was no statistically significant difference in MD (P =.77), neither in PSD values (P=.20)

Conclusions: : When interpreting FDT Matrix, apodized diffractive IOL (AcrySof ReSTORE) did not seem to cause any substantive interference in its results.

Keywords: perimetry • visual fields • intraocular lens 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×