May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Comparison of Fibrin Sealant vs. Suture for Wound Closure in Müller Muscle-Conjunctival Resection Repair
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. N. Welch
    Ophthalmology, Wilford Hall Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas
  • D. E. E. Holck
    Ophthalmology, Wilford Hall Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas
  • M. C. Kavanagh
    Ophthalmology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • M. P. Ohr
    Ophthalmology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • C. N. Czyz
    Ophthalmology, Doctors Hospital Ohio Health, Columbus, Ohio
  • K. V. Cahill
    Ophthalmology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • J. A. Foster
    Ophthalmology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.N. Welch, None; D.E.E. Holck, None; M.C. Kavanagh, None; M.P. Ohr, None; C.N. Czyz, None; K.V. Cahill, None; J.A. Foster, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 638. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. N. Welch, D. E. E. Holck, M. C. Kavanagh, M. P. Ohr, C. N. Czyz, K. V. Cahill, J. A. Foster; Comparison of Fibrin Sealant vs. Suture for Wound Closure in Müller Muscle-Conjunctival Resection Repair. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):638. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : Comparison of fibrin sealant vs. suture for wound closure in Müller muscle-conjunctival resection ptosis repair.

Methods: : The charts of 114 patients who had undergone Müller muscle-conjunctival resection were retrospectively reviewed. 211 eyelids were divided into two groups. Group 1 used suture for wound closure. Group 2 used fibrin sealant for wound closure. The preoperative and postoperative values were statistically compared using a paired t test. Complications were statistically analyzed using a two-tailed Fisher test. Postoperative symmetry (within 0.5 mm) and complications were compared.

Results: : Müller muscle-conjunctival resection ptosis repair was performed on 211 eyelids of 114 patients. Suture was used for wound closure on 45 eyelids (31 patients) and fibrin sealant was used on 166 eyelids (83 patients). The two groups did not differ statistically in lid height values. Postoperative symmetry within 0.5 mm was achieved in 28 of 31 patients (90%) in the sutured group and in 79 of 83 (95%) in the fibrin sealant group. In the suture group, eight of 31 patients (26%) had postoperative complications including moderate to severe pain (10%), suture granuloma (6%), corneal abrasion (3%), loose suture (3%), and persistent punctuate keratopathy (3%). No evidence of keratopathy or other complications were attributable to the fibrin sealant.

Conclusions: : Müller muscle-conjunctival resection ptosis repair using fibrin sealant for wound closure offers comparable lid position results as compared to wound closure using traditional suture technique. Use of fibrin sealant showed fewer postoperative complications and was associated with a lower rate of subsequent surgical procedures.

Keywords: wound healing • conjunctiva 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×