May 2008
Volume 49, Issue 13
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Agreement Among Glaucoma Experts and the S.t.a.r.ii(Acoring Toll for Assessing Risk) on Clinical Decisions for Ocular Hypertensive Patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • M. M. Faria, Sr.
    Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil
  • N. Kasahara, Sr.
    Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil
  • M. D. Paolera
    Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil
  • C. Caixeta-Umbelino
    Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil
  • A. C. Oliveira
    Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil
  • J. G. Costa
    Ophthalmology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo-SP, Brazil
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  M.M. Faria, None; N. Kasahara, None; M.D. Paolera, None; C. Caixeta-Umbelino, None; A.C. Oliveira, None; J.G. Costa, None.
  • Footnotes
    Support  None.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science May 2008, Vol.49, 1586. doi:https://doi.org/
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      M. M. Faria, Sr., N. Kasahara, Sr., M. D. Paolera, C. Caixeta-Umbelino, A. C. Oliveira, J. G. Costa; Agreement Among Glaucoma Experts and the S.t.a.r.ii(Acoring Toll for Assessing Risk) on Clinical Decisions for Ocular Hypertensive Patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008;49(13):1586. doi: https://doi.org/.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : To evaluate the agreement among examiners and the S.T.A.R II (Scoring Toll for Assessing Risk) on clinical decisions for ocular hypertensive patients.

Methods: : Twenty-eight ocular hypertensive patients enrolled the study. Data regarding age, ethnicity, past medical history, family history, visual acuity, intraocular pressure and central cornea thickness were collected and presented with a copy of the automated perimetry printout and a image of the optic disc to three glaucoma experts (A, B, C) that judged on personal experience the risk for glaucoma conversion and the decision to treat or not. Risk for glaucoma conversion was calculated by S.T.A.R. II. Agreement among examiners and S.T.A.R. II was evaluated by Cohen kappa statistics.

Results: : The agreement among examiners A, B, C and the risk calculator was poor (k = -0.0550 , P = 0.1722). The agreement among examiners A, B and C was poor (k = -0.0123, P = 0.4396).

Conclusions: : The level of agreement between glaucoma experts and the risk calculator was poor. Continuous upgrading of the calculator is deemed necessary in order to standardize the management of ocular hypertensive patients.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: risk factor assessment • intraocular pressure • optic disc 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×